首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Intramuscular Temperature Differences Between the Mid-Point and Peripheral Effective Radiating Area With Ultrasound
【2h】

Intramuscular Temperature Differences Between the Mid-Point and Peripheral Effective Radiating Area With Ultrasound

机译:超声在中点与周围有效辐射区之间的肌内温差

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the study was to determine whether uniform intramuscular heating is achieved throughout a treatment area 2 times the transducer head at both 1 and 3 MHz. Seven male and three female subjects (Age: 23.6 ± 1.0 yrs, Weight: 83.8 ± 23.2 kg, Site Skinfold: 13.9 ± 7.3 mm) underwent two ultrasound treatments (1 and 3 MHz) in the triceps surae muscle group. Thermocouples were inserted at the midpoint and periphery of the treatment area. Ten minute baseline temperatures were recorded followed by a ten minute ultrasound treatment. Two (site) X 10 (time) repeated measures ANOVAs were separately used to determine significance for 1 and 3 MHz treatments. Post-hoc testing was performed using the Bonferroni adjustment. A significant site-by-time interaction was observed for both the 1 and 3 MHz treatments. From baseline to the end of the treatment, temperature increased approximately 2.62°C and 1.58°C for the midpoint and periphery of the 1 MHz treatment and 5.88°C and 3.64°C for the 3 MHz treatment. The differences in temperature suggest that uniform heating does not occur throughout the treatment area.Key points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">3 MHz is more effective in raising intramuscular temperature within ERA.Stroke count/rate of transducer may play a factor in heating tissue.Treatment size may alter uniform heating.
机译:该研究的目的是确定在整个治疗区域内在1 MHz和3 MHz频率下是否均达到换能器头2倍的均匀肌内加热。在肱三头肌肱三头肌组中,对七名男性和三名女性受试者(年龄:23​​.6±1.0岁,体重:83.8±23.2 kg,部位皮肤皱褶:13.9±7.3 mm)进行了两次超声治疗(1和3 MHz)。将热电偶插入治疗区域的中点和外围。记录十分钟的基线温度,然后进行十分钟的超声处理。分别使用两个(站点)X 10(时间)重复测量方差分析来确定1和3 MHz处理的显着性。使用Bonferroni调整进行事后测试。在1 MHz和3 MHz处理中均观察到了显着的逐点相互作用。从基线到治疗结束,对于1 MHz治疗的中点和外围,温度分别升高约2.62°C和1.58°C,对于3 MHz治疗,温度升高约5.88°C和3.64°C。温度差异表明在整个治疗区域内不会发生均匀加热。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 3 MHz在提高ERA内的肌内温度方面更有效。 换能器的冲程数/速率可能是加热组织的一个因素 处理尺寸可能会改变均匀加热。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号