首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical and Translational Science >Using Research Metrics to Improve Timelines: Proceedings from the 2nd Annual CTSA Clinical Research Management Workshop
【2h】

Using Research Metrics to Improve Timelines: Proceedings from the 2nd Annual CTSA Clinical Research Management Workshop

机译:使用研究指标来改善时间表:第二届CTSA年度临床研究管理研讨会的会议记录

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium Workshop was conceived as a venue to foster communication among Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) in the development of methods to improve clinical research management. The consortium, comprised of 46 awardee sites as of 2009, many with multiple AMCs, is expected to expand to 60 sites when fully implemented. At the 2nd Annual CTSA Clinical Research Management Workshop held on June 22nd and 23rd, 2009, on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) campus, consortium members and potential CTSA sites gathered with stakeholders from private industry, the NIH, the Food and Drug Administration, and private research organizations, to formulate a plan to address challenges in clinical research management. Specific aims included improving protocol processing and sharing process improvement initiatives in the expectation that best practices will be implemented and improvements will be measured and reported. The findings presented at this workshop indicated significant variance in Institutional Review Board approval of protocols and contract execution by AMC and CTSA sites. Most represented marked delays compared to non‐AMC sites and that, as a likely consequence, AMCs were later to enroll patients and/or meet enrollment targets compared to dedicated or professional sites. Clin Trans Sci 2010; Volume 3: 305–308
机译:临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)联合会研讨会被认为是促进学术医学中心(AMC)之间交流改进临床研究管理方法的场所。截至2009年,该财团由46个获奖地点组成,其中许多拥有多个AMC,预计在全面实施后将扩大到60个地点。在2009年6月22日至23日在国立卫生研究院(NIH)校园举行的第二届CTSA年度临床研究管理研讨会上,财团成员和潜在的CTSA与私营企业,NIH,食品和药物管理局以及私营研究组织的利益相关者聚集在一起的站点,以制定应对临床研究管理挑战的计划。具体目标包括改善协议处理和共享流程改进计划,以期将实施最佳实践,并评估和报告改进措施。在这次研讨会上提出的调查结果表明,机构审查委员会对协议的批准以及AMC和CTSA站点执行合同的方式存在很大差异。与非AMC站点相比,大多数站点显着延迟,因此,与专用站点或专业站点相比,AMC可能会招募患者和/或达到入组目标。 Clin Trans Sci 2010;第3卷:305–308

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号