首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Thoracic Disease >An update on mandibular advancement devices for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome
【2h】

An update on mandibular advancement devices for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome

机译:下颌前移装置治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的最新进展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS). However, the high efficacy of CPAP is offset by intolerance and poor compliance, which can undermine effectiveness. This means that alternatives to CPAP are also necessary. In recent years, oral appliances have emerged as the leading alternative to CPAP. There is now a strong body of evidence supporting their use in OSAHS and clinical guidelines now recommend their use in mild OSAHS and in more severe cases when CPAP fails. These devices are by no means a homogenous group as they differ greatly in both design and action. The most commonly used appliances are mandibular advancement devices (MAD) that increase airway diameter with soft tissue displacement achieved by mandibular protrusion. Despite the growing evidence, there are still barriers to MAD provision. Their effectiveness can be difficult to predict and there is debate about the required level of design sophistication. These uncertainties prevent more widespread inclusion of MAD within clinical sleep services. This review will focus on the efficacy, effectiveness, design features, side-effects of and patient selection for MAD therapy. Comparison will also be made between MAD and CPAP therapy.
机译:持续的气道正压通气(CPAP)仍然是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停呼吸不足综合症(OSAHS)的金标准治疗方法。但是,CPAP的高效率被不宽容和依从性差所抵消,这可能会削弱有效性。这意味着CPAP的替代方案也是必要的。近年来,口腔器械已成为CPAP的主要替代产品。现在有大量证据支持它们在OSAHS中的使用,临床指南现在建议在轻度OSAHS以及CPAP失败的更严重情况下使用它们。这些设备绝不是同质的组,因为它们在设计和动作上都大相径庭。最常用的矫治器是下颌前移装置(MAD),可通过下颌前伸实现通过软组织移位来增加气道直径。尽管证据越来越多,但MAD设置仍然存在障碍。它们的有效性可能很难预测,关于设计复杂性的要求水平也存在争议。这些不确定性阻止了MAD广泛纳入临床睡眠服务。这篇综述将集中于MAD治疗的功效,有效性,设计特点,副作用和患者选择。 MAD和CPAP疗法也将进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号