首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Communicative Integrative Biology >Does food sharing in vampire bats demonstrate reciprocity?
【2h】

Does food sharing in vampire bats demonstrate reciprocity?

机译:吸血蝙蝠中的食物共享是否表现出互惠?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Claims of reciprocity (or reciprocal altruism) in animal societies often ignite controversy because authors disagree over definitions, naturalistic studies tend to demonstrate correlation not causation, and controlled experiments often involve artificial conditions. Food sharing among common vampire bats has been a classic textbook example of reciprocity, but this conclusion has been contested by alternative explanations. Here, we review factors that predict food sharing in vampire bats based on previously published and unpublished data, validate previous published results with more precise relatedness estimates, and describe current evidence for and against alternative explanations for its evolutionary stability. Although correlational evidence indicates a role for both direct and indirect fitness benefits, unequivocally demonstrating reciprocity in vampire bats still requires testing if and how bats respond to non-reciprocation.
机译:在动物社会中,互惠(或互惠利他主义)的主张经常引起争议,因为作者不同意定义,自然主义研究倾向于证明相关性而非因果关系,而受控实验通常涉及人为条件。常见的吸血蝙蝠之间的食物共享一直是互惠的经典教科书实例,但这一结论遭到其他解释的质疑。在这里,我们将根据先前发表和未发表的数据,回顾预测吸血蝙蝠食物共享的因素,以更精确的相关性估算来验证先前发表的结果,并描述当前证据,以支持和反对有关其进化稳定性的其他解释。尽管相关证据表明直接和间接健身益处都起作用,但明确地证明吸血蝙蝠的互惠性仍需要测试蝙蝠是否以及如何响应非往复运动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号