首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Critical Care >The staging of sepsis: understanding heterogeneity in treatment efficacy
【2h】

The staging of sepsis: understanding heterogeneity in treatment efficacy

机译:败血症的分期:了解治疗效果的异质性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Human sepsis is an intrinsically complex disease. Populations of patients enrolled into clinical trials of novel sepsis therapies are notoriously heterogeneous with respect to the inciting cause of their disease, the co-morbid conditions that define its course, and the acute severity of their initial presentation. This heterogeneity is reflected in strikingly variable mortality risks across studies, and probably, though less clearly-established, in variable response rates to a given intervention. In an accompanying article in this issue of Critical Care, Macias and colleagues argue that the effectiveness of adjuvant sepsis therapies is not dependent on the baseline mortality risk, since the few "positive" trials that have been published show widely divergent placebo mortality rates. But this analysis assumes that biologically distinct interventions will be equally efficacious in clinically diverse populations, and confuses severity as a population descriptor with severity as a surrogate measure of a biologic state in an individual patient. In a pivotal trial of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) in patients with severe sepsis, an aggregate 6% mortality decrement appeared to be the result of negligible efficacy in the least severely ill patients, and considerably greater efficacy in those who were at greatest risk of dying. A larger follow-up study recruiting low risk patients confirmed this impression, showing a convincing absence of benefit in patients who clinicians judged to be less severely ill. If we accept Macias' argument, we are led to the conclusion that rhAPC is of limited use in the management of severe sepsis. On the other hand, if we view severity as a crude surrogate for a particular pathologic state, we would shift our focus to better defining those populations most likely to benefit from intervention, including patients who may not have met criteria for entry in the original PROWESS trial – those with disseminated intravascular coagulation or acute organ dysfunction from causes other than sepsis. Staging systems that stratify heterogeneous patient populations by risk and by potential to benefit from intervention have proven to be essential to the development of multimodal adjuvant treatment for cancer. They will be no less important in the optimal management of sepsis.
机译:人败血症是一种内在的复杂疾病。众所周知,参与新型脓毒症疗法临床试验的患者群体在其疾病的诱因,定义病程的共病条件以及其初次就诊的严重程度方面是异质的。这种异质性反映在各个研究中的死亡风险显着不同,并且可能(尽管尚不明确)反映在对给定干预措施的可变反应率中。 Macias及其同事在本期《重症监护》的随附文章中指出,辅助性败血症治疗的有效性并不取决于基线死亡率风险,因为已发表的少数“阳性”试验显示安慰剂死亡率差异很大。但是该分析假设生物学上不同的干预措施在临床上不同的人群中同样有效,并且将严重程度作为人群描述因素与严重程度作为个体患者生物学状态的替代指标相混淆。在重组人活化蛋白C(rhAPC)对严重脓毒症患者的一项关键试验中,总的6%的死亡率降低似乎是对病情最轻的患者的影响可忽略不计的结果,而对那些病情最严重的患者则显着提高了疗效死亡的风险。一项招募低风险患者的大型随访研究证实了这种印象,表明临床医生认为病情较轻的患者没有令人信服的益处。如果我们接受Macias的论点,我们得出的结论是,rhAPC在严重脓毒症的治疗中用途有限。另一方面,如果我们将严重程度视为特定病理状态的粗略替代,我们将把重点转移到更好地定义那些最有可能从干预中受益的人群,包括可能不符合进入原始PROWESS标准的患者试验–那些因败血症以外原因引起的弥散性血管内凝血或急性器官功能障碍的患者。事实证明,分期系统可以通过风险和从干预中获益的潜力对异类患者群体进行分层,这对于开发癌症多模式辅助治疗至关重要。它们在败血症的最佳管理中同样重要。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 Critical Care
  • 作者

    John C Marshall;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2005(9),6
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 626–628
  • 总页数 3
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 护理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号