首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental >Gabexate mesylate in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis update
【2h】

Gabexate mesylate in the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis update

机译:甲磺酸加贝酯预防内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎:系统评价和荟萃分析更新

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Acute pancreatitis is a common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and the benefit of pharmacologic treatment of the condition is unclear. Although prophylactic use of gabexate mesylate (GM) for the reduction of pancreatic injury after ERCP has been evaluated, uncertainty remains regarding the effectiveness of GM treatment in post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP).>Objective: The aim of this study was to determine through systematic review and meta-analysis the effectiveness and tolerability of GM in the prophylaxis of PEP.>Methods: MEDLINE (January 1966–July 2007), EMBASE (January 1966– July 2007), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2007), and the China Biological Medicine Database (January 1978–July 2007) were searched. We used the method recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of GM in the prevention of PEP.>Results: Of the 38 studies identified, 31 were excluded for the following reasons: they were reviews or editorials (9 articles); were meta-analyses (4); had differences in cointerventions (4); were nonrandomized controlled trials or had incorrect randomization (4); were repeat publications (2); lacked a placebo group (1); or other (7). Seven RCTs, totaling 2883 patients, conducted in a variety of languages were included in the meta-analysis. When the RCTs were analyzed, odds ratios for GM were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.36–1.18; P 0.16) for PER 1.90 (95% CI, 0.54–6.65; P 0.32) for severe PEP, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.17–1.77; P 0.32) for the case-fatality ratio of PEP, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74–1.05; P 0.16) for post-ERCP hyperamylasemia, and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.49 1.25; P 0.30) for post-ERCP abdominal pain. No evidence of publication bias was found.>Conclusions: No beneficial effects of GM on acute pancreatitis, the PEP mortality rate, or post-ERCP abdominal pain or hyperamylasemia were found; therefore, GM cannot be recommended for the prophylaxis of PEP.
机译:>背景:急性胰腺炎是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的常见并发症,目前尚不清楚药物治疗该病的益处。尽管已经评估了甲磺酸依加比塞特(GM)减轻ERCP后胰腺损伤的预防效果,但在ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)中使用GM治疗的有效性仍存在不确定性。>目的: >方法::MEDLINE(1966年1月至2007年7月),EMBASE(1966年1月至2007年7月),这项研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析确定GM在预防PEP中的有效性和耐受性。检索了Cochrane图书馆的Cochrane对照试验注册簿(2007年第2期)和中国生物医学数据库(1978年1月至2007年7月)。我们使用Cochrane协作组织推荐的方法对GM预防PEP的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析。>结果:在确定的38项研究中,有31项是出于以下原因而被排除在外:基于评论或社论的观点(9条);进行荟萃分析(4);在共同干预方面有差异(4);非随机对照试验或不正确的随机分组(4);是重复出版物(2);缺乏安慰剂组(1);或其他(7)。荟萃分析包括以各种语言进行的七项随机对照试验,共2883名患者。分析RCT时,对于严重的PEP,GM 1.90(95%CI,0.54–6.65; P 0.32),GM的赔率比为0.65(95%CI,0.36-1.18; P 0.16),0.55(95%CI,0.17) –1.77; P 0.32)(PEP的致死率),ERCP术后高淀粉血症的0.88(95%CI,0.74–1.05; P 0.16)和-EPP后的0.78(95%CI,0.49 1.25; P 0.30)。 ERCP腹痛。没有发现发表偏倚的证据。>结论:没有发现GM对急性胰腺炎,PEP死亡率或ERCP后腹痛或高淀粉血症的有益作用。因此,不建议使用GM预防PEP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号