首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Thoracic Disease >Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies
【2h】

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) for aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of matched studies

机译:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)与无缝合主动脉瓣置换术(SUAVR)进行主动脉瓣狭窄:相关研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundWith improving technologies and an increasingly elderly populations, there have been an increasing number of therapeutic options available for patients requiring aortic valve replacement. Recent evidence suggests that transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is one suitable option for high risk inoperable patients, as well as high risk operable patients. Sutureless valve technology has also been developed concurrently, with facilitates surgical aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) by allow resection and replacement of the native aortic valve with minimal sutures and prosthesis anchoring required. For patients amenable for both TAVI and SUAVR, the evidence is unclear with regards to the benefits and risks of either approach. The objectives are to compare the perioperative outcomes and intermediate-term survival rates of TAVI and SUAVR in matched or propensity score matched studies.
机译:背景技术随着技术的进步和老年人口的增加,对于需要更换主动脉瓣的患者的治疗选择越来越多。最近的证据表明,经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是高风险无法手术的患者以及高风险可手术患者的一种合适选择。还同时开发了无缝线瓣膜技术,通过允许以最少的缝合线和假体锚定的方式切除和置换天然主动脉瓣膜,从而促进了外科手术主动脉瓣膜置换(SUAVR)。对于同时接受TAVI和SUAVR治疗的患者,关于这两种方法的益处和风险,证据尚不清楚。目的是比较匹配或倾向评分匹配研究中的TAVI和SUAVR的围手术期结局和中期生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号