首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine >Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic indications
【2h】

Recent advances in minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic indications

机译:妇科适应症微创手术的最新进展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Recently, an increasing interest in less invasive surgery has led to the advent of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). LESS and NOTES could be technically challenging, but available literature has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of LESS for benign gynecologic diseases. However, the evidence is not strong enough to recommend the use of LESS over that of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MLS). As per the results of the most recently published meta-analysis, the majority of surgical outcomes are equivalent between LESS and MLS, except for the longer operative time in LESS for both adnexal surgery and hysterectomy. Although an increasing number of studies have reported on robotic LESS, NOTES, and LESS for gynecologic malignancy, definite conclusions have not been drawn owing to the lack of sufficient information.
机译:最近,对微创外科手术的兴趣日益增长,导致腹腔镜内镜单部位手术(LESS)和自然孔腔内腔镜手术(NOTES)的出现。 LESS和NOTES可能在技术上具有挑战性,但现有文献证明LESS在良性妇科疾病中的可行性和安全性。但是,与常规的多端口腹腔镜手术(MLS)相比,没有足够的证据推荐使用LESS。根据最新发表的荟萃分析的结果,LESS和MLS之间的大多数手术结局是相同的,除了在LESS中进行附件手术和子宫切除术的手术时间更长。尽管关于机器人LESS,NOTES和LESS的关于妇科恶性肿瘤的研究越来越多,但由于缺乏足够的信息,尚未得出明确的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号