首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Is hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to transarterial chemoembolization?
【2h】

Is hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy effective treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to transarterial chemoembolization?

机译:肝动脉灌注化疗是否有效治疗对肝动脉化疗栓塞有抵抗力的晚期肝细胞癌?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) resistant to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).METHODS: This study was conducted on 42 patients who received HAIC for advanced HCC between 2001 and 2010 at our hospital. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was administered continuously for 24 h from day 1 to day 5 every 2-4 wk via an injection reservoir. Intra-arterial cisplatin or subcutaneous interferon was administered in combination with the 5-FU. The patients enrolled in this retrospective study were divided into two groups according to whether or not they fulfilled the criteria for resistance to TACE proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology in 2010 (written in Japanese); one group of patients who did not fulfill the criteria for TACE resistance (group A, n = 23), and another group who fulfilled the criteria for TACE resistance (group B, n = 19). We compared the outcomes in terms of the response and survival rates between the two groups.RESULTS: Both the response rate and tumor suppression rate following HAIC were significantly superior in group A than in group B (response rate: 48% vs 16%, P = 0.028, tumor suppression rate: 87% vs 53%, P = 0.014). Furthermore, both the progression-free survival rate and survival time were significantly superior in group A than in group B (3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-mo = 83%, 70%, 29% and 20% vs 63%, 42%, 16% and 0%, respectively, P = 0.040, and 9.8 mo vs 6.2 mo, P = 0.040). A multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards regression model) showed that resistance to TACE was an independent predictor of poor survival (P = 0.007).CONCLUSION: HAIC administrating 5-FU was not effective against advanced HCC resistant to TACE. Other tools for treatment, i.e., molecular-targeting agents may be considered for these cases.
机译:目的:评估肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)对经皮动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)耐药的晚期肝细胞癌(HACE)的有效性。方法:本研究针对2001年至2010年间在我市接受过HAIC治疗的42例患者医院。从第1天到第5天每2-4 wk通过注射储液器连续连续24-h施用5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)24小时。动脉内顺铂或皮下干扰素与5-FU联合给药。参加这项回顾性研究的患者根据他们是否符合日本肝病学会在2010年提出的对TACE耐药的标准(以日语编写)分为两组。一组不符合TACE抵抗标准的患者(A组,n = 23),另一组满足TACE抵抗标准的患者(B组,n = 19)。我们比较了两组之间在反应和生存率方面的结果。结果:HAIC后的反应率和肿瘤抑制率均显着优于A组(响应率:48%vs 16%,P = 0.028,肿瘤抑制率:87%对53%,P = 0.014)。此外,A组的无进展生存率和生存时间均显着优于B组(3-mo,6-mo,12mo和24-mo分别为83%,70%,29%和20%vs 63分别为%,42%,16%和0%,P = 0.040,以及9.8 mo和6.2 mo,P = 0.040)。多因素分析(Cox比例风险回归模型)表明,对TACE的耐药性是生存不良的独立预测因素(P = 0.007)。结论:HAIC施用5-FU对晚期TCC耐药的HCC无效。对于这些情况,可以考虑使用其他治疗工具,即分子靶向剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号