首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients
【2h】

Comparison of different nutritional assessments in detecting malnutrition among gastric cancer patients

机译:胃癌患者营养不良状况不同营养评估方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of preoperative and postoperative malnutrition and the relationships between objective and subjective nutritional assessment of gastric cancer patients.METHODS: From October 2005 to July 2006, we studied 80 patients with no evidence of recurrent disease and no loss to follow-up after curative surgery for gastric cancer. In this group, 9 patients underwent total gastrectomy and 71 patients subtotal gastrectomy. At admission, 6 and 12 mo after surgery, the patients were assessed on the subjective global assessment (SGA), nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), nutritional risk index (NRI) and by anthropometric measurements and laboratory data. Differences between the independent groups were assessed with the Student’s t test and one-way analysis of variance. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the association between the scores and variables.RESULTS: The prevalence of malnutrition at admission was 31% by SGA and 43% by NRS-2002. At admission, the anthropometric data were lower in the malnourished groups defined by the SGA and NRS-2002 assessments, but did not differ between the groups using the NRI assessment. Body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), triceps skin fold and midarm circumference were significantly reduced, but the total lymphocyte count, albumin, protein, cholesterol and serum iron levels did not decrease during the postoperative period. Six months after surgery, there was a good correlation between the nutritional assessment tools (SGA and NRS-2002) and the other nutritional measurement tools (BW, BMI, and anthropometric measurements). However, 12 mo after surgery, most patients who were assessed as malnourished by SGA and NRS-2002 had returned to their preoperative status, although their BW, BMI, and anthropometric measurements still indicated a malnourished status.CONCLUSION: A combination of objective and subjective assessments is needed for the early detection of the nutritional status in case of gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy.
机译:目的:评估胃癌患者术前和术后营养不良的患病率以及客观和主观营养评估之间的关系。方法:自2005年10月至2006年7月,我们研究了80例无复发疾病证据且无随访损失的患者-胃癌的根治性手术后最多。在这组中,有9例行了全胃切除术,有71例行了全胃切除术。入院后6个月和12个月,对患者进行主观总体评估(SGA),营养风险筛查(NRS-2002),营养风险指数(NRI)以及人体测量和实验室数据进行评估。通过学生的t检验和单向方差分析评估独立组之间的差异。计算Spearman等级相关系数以评估得分与变量之间的关系。结果:入院时营养不良的患病率为31%,NRS-2002为43%。入院时,由SGA和NRS-2002评估定义的营养不良组的人体测量数据较低,但使用NRI评估的组之间没有差异。体重(BW),体重指数(BMI),三头肌皮肤褶皱和中臂围明显降低,但术后总淋巴细胞计数,白蛋白,蛋白质,胆固醇和血清铁水平并未降低。术后六个月,营养评估工具(SGA和NRS-2002)与其他营养测量工具(体重,体重指数和人体测量值)之间具有良好的相关性。然而,在手术后12个月,尽管BW,BMI和人体测量结果仍显示营养不良,但大多数通过SGA和NRS-2002评估为营养不良的患者已恢复到术前状态。结论:客观和主观的结合对于胃癌切除术后的胃癌患者,需要进行评估以及早发现营养状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号