首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Upper gastrointestinal bleeding etiology score for predicting variceal and non-variceal bleeding
【2h】

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding etiology score for predicting variceal and non-variceal bleeding

机译:上消化道出血病因评分可预测静脉曲张和非静脉曲张出血

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To identify clinical parameters, and develop an Upper Gastrointesinal Bleeding (UGIB) Etiology Score for predicting the types of UGIB and validate the score.METHODS: Patients with UGIB who underwent endoscopy within 72 h were enrolled. Clinical and basic laboratory parameters were prospectively collected. Predictive factors for the types of UGIB were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses and were used to generate the UGIB Etiology Score. The best cutoff of the score was defined from the receiver operating curve and prospectively validated in another set of patients with UGIB.RESULTS: Among 261 patients with UGIB, 47 (18%) had variceal and 214 (82%) had non-variceal bleeding. Univariate analysis identified 27 distinct parameters significantly associated with the types of UGIB. Logistic regression analysis identified only 3 independent factors for predicting variceal bleeding; previous diagnosis of cirrhosis or signs of chronic liver disease (OR 22.4, 95% CI 8.3-60.4, P < 0.001), red vomitus (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.8-11.9, P = 0.02), and red nasogastric (NG) aspirate (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.3, P = 0.011). The UGIB Etiology Score was calculated from (3.1 × previous diagnosis of cirrhosis or signs of chronic liver disease) + (1.5 × red vomitus) + (1.2 × red NG aspirate), when 1 and 0 are used for the presence and absence of each factor, respectively. Using a cutoff ≥ 3.1, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) in predicting variceal bleeding were 85%, 81%, 82%, 50%, and 96%, respectively. The score was prospectively validated in another set of 195 UGIB cases (46 variceal and 149 non-variceal bleeding). The PPV and NPV of a score ≥ 3.1 for variceal bleeding were 79% and 97%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The UGIB Etiology Score, composed of 3 parameters, using a cutoff ≥ 3.1 accurately predicted variceal bleeding and may help to guide the choice of initial therapy for UGIB before endoscopy.
机译:目的:确定临床参数,并制定上消化道出血病因评分,以预测UGIB的类型并验证评分。方法:纳入在72小时内接受内镜检查的UGIB患者。前瞻性收集临床和基本实验室参数。通过单因素和多因素分析确定了UGIB类型的预测因素,并将其用于生成UGIB病因评分。从受试者的工作曲线中确定最佳评分标准,并在另一组UGIB患者中进行前瞻性验证。结果:在261例UGIB患者中,静脉曲张破裂出血47例(18%),非静脉曲张破裂出血214例(82%) 。单变量分析确定了与UGIB类型显着相关的27个不同参数。 Logistic回归分析仅确定了3个独立因素来预测静脉曲张破裂出血;先前诊断为肝硬化或慢性肝病的体征(OR 22.4,95%CI 8.3-60.4,P <0.001),红色呕吐(OR 4.6,95%CI 1.8-11.9,P = 0.02)和红色鼻胃(NG)抽吸(OR 3.3,95%CI 1.3-8.3,P = 0.011)。 UGIB病因学评分是根据(3.1×以前诊断为肝硬化或慢性肝病的体征)+(1.5×红色呕吐)+(1.2×红色NG抽吸物)计算的,当分别使用1和0表示存在和不存在时因素。使用截止值≥3.1,预测曲张静脉出血的敏感性,特异性,准确性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为85%,81%,82%,50%和96%。在另一组195例UGIB病例(46例静脉曲张和149例非静脉曲张出血)中前瞻性地验证了该评分。结论:UGIB病因学评分由3个参数组成,使用截止值≥3.1可以准确预测静脉曲张破裂出血,其PPV≥3.1的PPV和NPV分别为79%和97%。内镜检查之前先进行UGIB的初始治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号