首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients
【2h】

Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients

机译:经鼻小口径食管胃十二指肠镜未镇静的老年人和卧床患者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate the safety of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for elderly and critically ill bedridden patients.METHODS: One prospective randomized comparative study and one crossover comparative study between transnasal small-caliber EGD and transoral conventional EGD was done (Study 1). For the comparative study, we enrolled 240 elderly patients aged > 65 years old. For the crossover analysis, we enrolled 30 bedridden patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) (Study 2). We evaluated cardiopulmonary effects by measuring arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) and calculating the rate-pressure product (RPP) (pulse rate × systolic blood pressure/100) at baseline, 2 and 5 min after endoscopic intubation in Study 1. To assess the risk for endoscopy-related aspiration pneumonia during EGD, we also measured blood leukocyte counts and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before and 3 d after EGD in Study 2.RESULTS: In Study 1, we observed significant decreases in SpO2 during conventional transoral EGD, but not during transnasal small-caliber EGD (0.24% vs -0.24% after 2 min, and 0.18% vs -0.29% after 5 min, P = 0.034, P = 0.044). Significant differences of the RPP were not found between conventional transoral and transnasal small-caliber EGD. In Study 2, crossover analysis showed statistically significant increases of the RPP at 2 min after intubation and the end of endoscopy (26.8 and 34.6 vs 3.1 and 15.2, P = 0.044, P = 0.046), and decreases of SpO2 (-0.8% vs -0.1%, P = 0.042) during EGD with transoral conventional in comparison with transnasal small-caliber endoscopy. Thus, for bedridden patients with PEG feeding, who were examined in the supine position, transoral conventional EGD more severely suppressed cardiopulmonary function than transnasal small-caliber EGD. There were also significant increases in the markers of inflammation, blood leukocyte counts and serum CRP values, in bedridden patients after transoral conventional EGD, but not after transnasal small-caliber EGD performed with the patient in the supine position. Leukocyte count increased from 6053 ± 1975/L to 6900 ± 3392/L (P = 0.0008) and CRP values increased from 0.93 ± 0.24 to 2.49 ± 0.91 mg/dL (P = 0.0005) at 3 d after transoral conventional EGD. Aspiration pneumonia, possibly caused by the endoscopic examination, was found subsequently in two of 30 patients after transoral conventional EGD.CONCLUSION: Transnasal small-caliber EGD is a safer method than transoral conventional EGD in critically ill, bedridden patients who are undergoing PEG feeding.
机译:目的:评估未镇静的经鼻小口径食管胃十二指肠镜(EGD)对老年和重症卧床患者的安全性。方法:进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,一项经鼻小口径EGD与经口常规EGD的交叉对照研究(研究1)。为了进行比较研究,我们招募了240名年龄大于65岁的老年患者。对于交叉分析,我们招募了30位卧床经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)的患者(研究2)。我们在研究1的内镜插管后2分钟和5分钟时,通过测量动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)并计算基线时,脉搏率×收缩压/ 100的速率-压力乘积(RPP)(脉搏率×收缩压/ 100)来评估心肺功能。对于EGD期间与内镜相关的吸入性肺炎,我们还在研究2中测量了EGD之前和之后3 d的白细胞计数和血清C反应蛋白(CRP)水平。结果:在研究1中,我们观察到常规经口期间SpO2显着降低。 EGD,但在经鼻小口径EGD期间没有(2分钟后为0.24%vs -0.24%,5分钟后为0.18%vs -0.29%,P = 0.034,P = 0.044)。在常规经口和经鼻小口径EGD之间未发现RPP的显着差异。在研究2中,交叉分析显示,插管后2分钟和内窥镜检查结束时RPP在统计学上显着增加(26.8和34.6与3.1和15.2,P = 0.044,P = 0.046),而SpO2的降低(-0.8%vs与经鼻小口径内窥镜检查相比,经口常规EGD期间-0.1%,P = 0.042)。因此,对于卧床检查的卧床卧床的PEG喂养患者,经口常规EGD比经鼻小口径EGD更能严重抑制心肺功能。经卧常规EGD卧床后,卧床患者的炎症标志物,血白细胞计数和血清CRP值也显着增加,而仰卧位患者经鼻小口径EGD后则没有。经口服常规EGD后3 d,白细胞计数从6053±1975 / L增加到6900±3392 / L(P = 0.0008),CRP值从0.93±0.24增加到2.49±0.91 mg / dL(P = 0.0005)。经口服常规EGD的30例患者中有2例后来发现有可能是由内窥镜检查引起的吸入性肺炎。结论:对于经PEG喂养的重症,卧床不起的患者,经鼻小口径EGD比经口常规EGD安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号