首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients
【2h】

Portal hemodynamics as predictors of high risk esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients

机译:门脉血流动力学预测肝硬化患者高风险食管静脉曲张

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To evaluate portal hypertension parameters in liver cirrhosis patients with and without esophageal varices (EV).METHODS: A cohort of patients with biopsy confirmed liver cirrhosis was investigated endoscopically and with color Doppler ultrasonography as a possible non-invasive predictive tool. The relationship between portal hemodynamics and the presence and size of EV was evaluated using uni- and multivariate approaches.RESULTS: Eighty five consecutive cirrhotic patients (43 men and 42 women) were enrolled. Mean age (± SD) was 47.5 (± 15.9). Portal vein diameter (13.88 ± 2.42 vs 12.00 ± 1.69, P < 0.0005) and liver vascular index (8.31 ± 2.72 vs 17.8 ± 6.28, P < 0.0005) were found to be significantly higher in patients with EV irrespective of size and in patients with large varices (14.54 ± 1.48 vs 13.24 ± 2.55, P < 0.05 and 6.45 ± 2.78 vs 10.96 ± 5.05, P < 0.0005, respectively), while portal vein flow velocity (13.25 ± 3.66 vs 20.25 ± 5.05, P < 0.0005), congestion index (CI) (0.11 ± 0.03 vs 0.06 ± 0.03, P < 0.0005), portal hypertensive index (2.62 ± 0.79 vs 1.33 ± 0.53, P < 0.0005), and hepatic (0.73 ± 0.07 vs 0.66 ± 0.07, P < 0.001) and splenic artery resistance index (RI) (0.73 ± 0.06 vs 0.62 ± 0.08, P < 0.0005) were significantly lower. A logistic regression model confirmed spleen size (P = 0.002, AUC 0.72) and portal hypertensive index (P = 0.040, AUC 0.79) as independent predictors for the occurrence of large esophageal varices (LEV).CONCLUSION: Our data suggest two independent situations for beginning endoscopic evaluation of compensated cirrhotic patients: Portal hypertensive index > 2.08 and spleen size > 15.05 cm. These factors may help identifying patients with a low probability of LEV who may not need upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
机译:目的:评估有无食管静脉曲张(EV)的肝硬化患者的门静脉高压参数。方法:对一组活检患者进行了内镜检查,并通过彩色多普勒超声检查作为可能的非侵入性预测工具,证实了肝硬化。采用单因素和多因素方法评估门静脉血流动力学与EV的存在和大小之间的关系。结果:纳入了85例连续性肝硬化患者(43例男性和42例女性)。平均年龄(±SD)为47.5(±15.9)。发现EV患者不论大小,门静脉直径(13.88±2.42 vs 12.00±1.69,P <0.0005)和肝血管指数(8.31±2.72 vs 17.8±6.28,P <0.0005)均显着较高。大静脉曲张(14.54±1.48 vs 13.24±2.55,P <0.05和6.45±2.78 vs 10.96±5.05,P <0.0005),门静脉流速(13.25±3.66 vs 20.25±5.05,P <0.0005),充血指数(CI)(0.11±0.03 vs 0.06±0.03,P <0.0005),门脉高压指数(2.62±0.79 vs 1.33±0.53,P <0.0005)和肝(0.73±0.07 vs 0.66±0.07,P <0.001)和脾动脉阻力指数(RI)(0.73±0.06 vs 0.62±0.08, P <0.0005)显着降低。 Logistic回归模型确认脾脏大小( P = 0.002,AUC 0.72)和门静脉高压指数( P = 0.040,AUC 0.79)是大食管发生的独立预测因子结论:我们的数据提示了两种独立的情况,可以开始内镜评估代偿性肝硬化患者:门静脉高压指数> 2.08和脾脏大小> 15.05 cm。这些因素可能有助于确定可能不需要上消化道内窥镜检查的LEV可能性低的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号