首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Clinical Cases >Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate
【2h】

Improved bowel preparation increases polyp detection and unmasks significant polyp miss rate

机译:改进的肠道准备可增加息肉检出率并掩盖明显的息肉漏诊率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To retrospectively compare previous-day vs split-dose preparation in terms of bowel cleanliness and polyp detection in patients referred for polypectomy.METHODS: Fifty patients underwent two colonoscopies: one diagnostic in a private clinic and a second for polypectomy in a University Hospital. The latter procedures were performed within 12 wk of the index ones. Examinations were accomplished by two experienced endoscopists, different in each facility. Twenty-seven patients underwent screening/surveillance colonoscopy, while the rest were symptomatic. Previous day bowel preparation was utilized initially and split-dose for polypectomy. Colon cleansing was evaluated using the Aronchick scale. We measured the number of detected polyps, and the polyp miss rates per-polyp.RESULTS: Excellent/good preparation was reported in 38 cases with previous-day preparation (76%) vs 46 with split-dose (92%), respectively (P = 0.03). One hundred and twenty-six polyps were detected initially and 169 subsequently (P < 0.0001); 88 vs 126 polyps were diminutive (P < 0.0001), 25 vs 29 small (P = 0.048) and 13 vs 14 equal or larger than 10 mm. The miss rates for total, diminutive, small and large polyps were 25.4%, 30.1%, 13.7% and 6.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that split-dose preparation was significantly associated (OR, P) with increased number of polyps detected overall (0.869, P < 0.001), in the right (0.418, P = 0.008) and in the left colon (0.452, P = 0.02).CONCLUSION: Split-dose preparation improved colon cleansing, enhanced polyp detection and unmasked significant polyp miss rates.
机译:目的:回顾性比较息肉切除术患者前一天和分剂量制剂在肠道清洁度和息肉检测方面的作用。方法:五十例患者接受了两次结肠镜检查:一名在私人诊所进行诊断,第二次在大学医院进行息肉切除术。 。后面的过程在索引的12周内执行。考试由两名经验丰富的内镜医师完成,每个医师在每个机构中都不相同。 27例患者接受了结肠镜检查/监视,其余患者有症状。前一天的肠准备工作最初是采用息肉切除术。使用Aronchick量表评估结肠清洁。结果:在前一天的准备中,有38例报告了优良/良好的准备(76%),而分剂量的有46例(92%)报告了优良/良好的准备( P = 0.03)。最初检测到126个息肉,随后检测到169个(P <0.0001);小于或等于10mm的息肉分别为88比126和126较小(P <0.0001),25比29小(P = 0.048)和13比14。总息肉,小息肉,小息肉和大息肉的漏检率分别为25.4%,30.1%,13.7%和6.6%。多变量分析表明,分剂量制剂与总检出息肉数目增加(0.869,P <0.001),右侧(0.418,P = 0.008)和左侧结肠(0.452,P)显着相关(OR,P)。 = 0.02)。结论:分次剂量制剂改善了结肠清洗效果,增强了息肉检出率并且显着掩盖了息肉未命中率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号