首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Ulster Medical Journal >A comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with Doppler sonography in the assessment of carotid arterial stenosis.
【2h】

A comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with Doppler sonography in the assessment of carotid arterial stenosis.

机译:动脉内数字减影血管造影与多普勒超声检查在颈动脉狭窄评估中的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A comparison is made of the use of selective intra-arterial subtraction angiography and doppler sonography in the assessment of disease in 206 carotid arteries. Maximal stenoses in each of the internal, external and common carotid arteries were recorded and compared using both modalities. In 93% of cases, arteries reported as normal ultrasonically were also found to be normal on angiography. However, agreement between the modalities in the assessment of severe stenoses was rather less at 79%. Overall agreement between the two modalities was good using statistical analysis (weighted Kappa). It is our view that ultrasound is reliable in normal vessels, but where significant disease is present the rate of error between the two modalities is too high to warrant omission of angiography.
机译:比较了选择性动脉内减影血管造影和多普勒超声检查对206例颈动脉疾病的评估。使用两种方式记录并比较每个内部,外部和颈总动脉的最大狭窄。在93%的病例中,在血管造影上也发现超声报告为正常的动脉是正常的。但是,评估严重狭窄的方式之间的一致性相当低,为79%。使用统计分析(加权Kappa),两种方法之间的总体一致性良好。我们认为超声在正常血管中是可靠的,但是在存在重大疾病的地方,两种方式之间的错误率过高,以至于无法进行血管造影。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号