首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Trends in Hearing >Consumer Preferences for Hearing Aid Attributes
【2h】

Consumer Preferences for Hearing Aid Attributes

机译:消费者对助听器属性的偏好

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Low utilization of hearing aids has drawn increased attention to the study of consumer preferences using both simple ratings (e.g., Likert scale) and conjoint analyses, but these two approaches often produce inconsistent results. The study aims to directly compare Likert scales and conjoint analysis in identifying important attributes associated with hearing aids among those with hearing loss. Seven attributes of hearing aids were identified through qualitative research: performance in quiet settings, comfort, feedback, frequency of battery replacement, purchase price, water and sweat resistance, and performance in noisy settings. The preferences of 75 outpatients with hearing loss were measured with both a 5-point Likert scale and with 8 paired-comparison conjoint tasks (the latter being analyzed using OLS [ordinary least squares] and logistic regression). Results were compared by examining implied willingness-to-pay and Pearson’s Rho. A total of 56 respondents (75%) provided complete responses. Two thirds of respondents were male, most had sensorineural hearing loss, and most were older than 50; 44% of respondents had never used a hearing aid. Both methods identified improved performance in noisy settings as the most valued attribute. Respondents were twice as likely to buy a hearing aid with better functionality in noisy environments (p < .001), and willingness to pay for this attribute ranged from US$2674 on the Likert to US$9000 in the conjoint analysis. The authors find a high level of concordance between the methods—a result that is in stark contrast with previous research. The authors conclude that their result stems from constraining the levels on the Likert scale.
机译:助听器利用率低下已使人们越来越重视使用简单等级(例如李克特量表)和联合分析进行的消费者偏好研究,但是这两种方法通常会产生不一致的结果。这项研究的目的是直接比较李克特量表和联合分析,以识别听力丧失者中与助听器有关的重要属性。通过定性研究确定了助听器的七个属性:安静环境下的性能,舒适度,反馈,更换电池的频率,购买价格,耐水和耐汗性以及嘈杂环境下的性能。通过5点Likert量表和8个配对比较联合任务(使用OLS [普通最小二乘法]和logistic回归分析后者)来衡量75名听力下降的门诊患者的偏好。通过检查隐含的支付意愿和皮尔森的Rho比较了结果。共有56位受访者(75%)提供了完整的答复。三分之二的受访者是男性,大多数患有感觉神经性听力损失,并且大多数年龄超过50岁; 44%的受访者从未使用助听器。两种方法都将嘈杂环境中的性能提升视为最有价值的属性。在嘈杂的环境中(p <.001),受访者购买功能更好的助听器的可能性是原来的两倍(在李克特公司,其愿意支付的费用为2674美元,在联合分析中,为9000美元)。作者发现方法之间的高度一致性,这一结果与先前的研究形成了鲜明的对比。作者得出的结论是,他们的结果来自于限制李克特量表的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号