首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example
【2h】

Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: a worked example

机译:在复杂干预的系统评价中使用定性比较分析(QCA):一个可行的例子

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSystematic reviews that address policy and practice questions in relation to complex interventions frequently need not only to assess the efficacy of a given intervention but to identify which intervention - and which intervention components - might be most effective in particular situations. Here, intervention replication is rare, and commonly used synthesis methods are less useful when the focus of analysis is the identification of those components of an intervention that are critical to its success.
机译:背景技术针对与复杂干预措施有关的政策和实践问题的系统评价通常不仅需要评估给定干预措施的效力,还需要确定在特定情况下哪种干预措施和哪些干预措施组件最有效。在这里,干预复制很少见,而当分析的重点是确定对其成功至关重要的那些组件时,常用的合成方法就没有多大用处了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号