首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Stroke Research and Treatment >Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT): Current Perspectives and Future Directions
【2h】

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT): Current Perspectives and Future Directions

机译:约束诱导运动疗法(CIMT):当前观点和未来方向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) has gained considerable popularity as a treatment technique for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with mild-to-moderate stroke. While substantial evidence has emerged to support its applicability, issues remain unanswered regarding the best and most practical approach. Following the establishment of what can be called the “signature” CIMT approach characterized by intense clinic/laboratory-based practice, several distributed forms of training, collectively known as modified constraint therapy (mCIMT), have emerged. There is a need to examine the strengths and limitations of such approaches, and based upon such information, develop the components of a study that would compare the signature approach to the best elements of mCIMT, referred to here as “alternative” CIMT. Based upon a PEDro review of literature, limitations in mCIMT studies for meeting criteria were identified and discussed. A suggestion for a “first effort” at a comparative study that would both address such limitations while taking practical considerations into account is provided.
机译:约束诱发运动疗法(CIMT)作为轻度至中度卒中患者上肢康复的治疗技术已获得广泛普及。尽管已经出现大量证据支持其适用性,但是关于最佳和最实用方法的问题仍未得到解答。在建立了以临床/实验室为基础的实践为特征的所谓“签名” CIMT方法之后,出现了几种分布式培训形式,统称为改良约束疗法(mCIMT)。有必要检查这种方法的优势和局限性,并根据这些信息,开展一项研究,将签名方法与mCIMT的最佳要素(此处称为“替代性” CIMT)进行比较。根据PEDro文献综述,确定并讨论了mCIMT研究中满足标准的局限性。建议在比较研究中“尽力而为”,既要解决这些局限性,又要考虑实际因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号