首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Using a Mobile Device App and Proximal Remote Sensing Technologies to Assess Soil Cover Fractions on Agricultural Fields
【2h】

Using a Mobile Device App and Proximal Remote Sensing Technologies to Assess Soil Cover Fractions on Agricultural Fields

机译:使用移动设备 App和近距离遥感技术评估农田上的土壤覆盖率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quantifying the amount of crop residue left in the field after harvest is a key issue for sustainability. Conventional assessment approaches (e.g., line-transect) are labor intensive, time-consuming and costly. Many proximal remote sensing devices and systems have been developed for agricultural applications such as cover crop and residue mapping. For instance, current mobile devices (smartphones & tablets) are usually equipped with digital cameras and global positioning systems and use applications (apps) for in-field data collection and analysis. In this study, we assess the feasibility and strength of a mobile device app developed to estimate crop residue cover. The performance of this novel technique (from here on referred to as “app” method) was compared against two point counting approaches: an established digital photograph-grid method and a new automated residue counting script developed in MATLAB at the University of Guelph. Both photograph-grid and script methods were used to count residue under 100 grid points. Residue percent cover was estimated using the app, script and photograph-grid methods on 54 vertical digital photographs (images of the ground taken from above at a height of 1.5 m) collected from eighteen fields (9 corn and 9 soybean, 3 samples each) located in southern Ontario. Results showed that residue estimates from the app method were in good agreement with those obtained from both photograph–grid and script methods (R2 = 0.86 and 0.84, respectively). This study has found that the app underestimates the residue coverage by −6.3% and −10.8% when compared to the photograph-grid and script methods, respectively. With regards to residue type, soybean has a slightly lower bias than corn (i.e., −5.3% vs. −7.4%). For photos with residue <30%, the app derived residue measurements are within ±5% difference (bias) of both photograph-grid- and script-derived residue measurements. These methods could therefore be used to track the recommended minimum soil residue cover of 30%, implemented to reduce farmland topsoil and nutrient losses that impact water quality. Overall, the app method was found to be a good alternative to the point counting methods, which are more time-consuming.
机译:量化收获后留在田间的农作物残留量是可持续性的关键问题。常规评估方法(例如,线样)是劳动密集型,费时且昂贵的。已经开发了许多近端遥感设备和系统用于农业应用,例如覆盖作物和残留物测绘。例如,当前的移动设备(智能手机和平板电脑)通常配备数码相机和全球定位系统,并使用应用程序(apps)进行现场数据收集和分析。在这项研究中,我们评估了开发用于估算农作物残茬覆盖率的移动设备应用程序的可行性和强度。将该新技术(从此称为“ app”方法)的性能与两种点计数方法进行了比较:一种建立的数字照片网格方法和一种由Guelph大学在MATLAB中开发的新的自动残留计数脚本。使用照片网格和脚本方法对100个网格点以下的残留物进行计数。使用应用程序,脚本和照片网格方法对从18个田地(9个玉米和9个大豆,每个3个样品)收集的54幅垂直数字照片(从上方以1.5 m的高度拍摄的地面图像)进行估算,得出残留物覆盖率位于安大略省南部。结果表明,app方法的残留物估计值与照片网格方法和脚本方法的残留率估计值均相符(R 2 分别为0.86和0.84)。这项研究发现,与照相网格和脚本方法相比,该应用程序低估了残渣覆盖率-6.3%和-10.8%。就残留物类型而言,大豆的偏差略低于玉米(即-5.3%对-7.4%)。对于残留物<30%的照片,应用程序导出的残留物测量值与照片网格和脚本衍生的残留物测量值之间的偏差(偏差)在±5%之内。因此,这些方法可用于追踪建议的最低土壤残留覆盖率30%,以减少影响水质的农田表层土壤和养分流失。总的来说,发现app方法是点计数方法的一种很好的替代方法,因为它们比较耗时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号