首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Science Advances >Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development
【2h】

Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development

机译:改善本科的STEM教育:以学科为基础的专业发展的功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We sought to determine whether instructional practices used by undergraduate faculty in the geosciences have shifted from traditional teacher-centered lecture toward student-engaged teaching practices and to evaluate whether the national professional development program On the Cutting Edge (hereinafter Cutting Edge) has been a contributing factor in this change. We surveyed geoscience faculty across the United States in 2004, 2009, and 2012 and asked about teaching practices as well as levels of engagement in education research, scientific research, and professional development related to teaching. We tested these self-reported survey results with direct observations of teaching using the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol, and we conducted interviews to understand what aspects of Cutting Edge have supported change. Survey data show that teaching strategies involving active learning have become more common, that these practices are concentrated in faculty who invest in learning about teaching, and that faculty investment in learning about teaching has increased. Regression analysis shows that, after controlling for other key influences, faculty who have participated in Cutting Edge programs and who regularly use resources on the Cutting Edge website are statistically more likely to use active learning teaching strategies. Cutting Edge participants also report that learning about teaching, the availability of teaching resources, and interactions with peers have supported changes in their teaching practice. Our data suggest that even one-time participation in a workshop with peers can lead to improved teaching by supporting a combination of affective and cognitive learning outcomes.
机译:我们试图确定地球科学本科生所使用的教学实践是否已从以教师为中心的传统讲座转变为以学生为中心的教学实践,并评估了国家前沿专业发展计划(以下简称“前沿”)是否有所贡献影响这一变化的因素。我们在2004年,2009年和2012年对美国各地的地球科学学院进行了调查,并询问了教学实践以及与教学有关的教育研究,科学研究和专业发展的参与程度。我们使用《改革后的教学观察协议》通过对教学的直接观察测试了这些自我报告的调查结果,并进行了访谈,以了解《先锋》的哪些方面支持变革。调查数据表明,涉及主动学习的教学策略已经变得更加普遍,这些实践集中在投资于学习教学的教师中,并且教师在学习教学方面的投资也在增加。回归分析显示,在控制了其他关键影响因素之后,参加过Cuting Edge计划并且经常使用Cutting Edge网站上的资源的教师在统计学上更倾向于使用主动学习教学策略。最前沿的参与者还报告说,关于教学的学习,教学资源的可用性以及与同伴的互动支持了他们教学实践的变化。我们的数据表明,即使是一次与同伴一起参加研讨会,也可以通过支持情感和认知学习成果的结合来改善教学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号