首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >Oculomotor and Pupillometric Indices of Pro- and Antisaccade Performance in Youth-Onset Psychosis and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
【2h】

Oculomotor and Pupillometric Indices of Pro- and Antisaccade Performance in Youth-Onset Psychosis and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

机译:青年发作性精神病和注意缺陷/多动障碍的眼动和眼动表现的动眼和眼动指数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The goals of the study were to examine inhibitory deficits on the antisaccade task in 8- to 20-year olds with youth-onset psychosis or attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and healthy controls and to examine if age-related changes in performance differed across groups. In addition to the conventional measures of performance, pupillary dilations were used to obtain estimates of phasic and tonic level of arousal. Results showed that the psychosis, but not the ADHD, group had elevated antisaccade error rates; however, variability of error rates was high in all groups. These inhibitory failures were accompanied by a lower level of momentary cognitive effort (as indexed by pupillary dilations). The largest differences between the control and clinical groups were found not in the expected indices of inhibition but in the probability of correcting inhibitory errors and in variability of antisaccade response times, which were correlated with each other. These findings did not appear to be attributable to a deficit in maintaining task instructions in mind in either disorder or lack of motivation in ADHD. Instead, results point to impairments in both clinical groups in sustaining attention on a trial-by-trial basis, resulting in deficits in self-monitoring. Thus, results show inhibitory deficits in the context of more general attentional impairments in both disorders.
机译:该研究的目的是检查在8至20岁患有青年型精神病或注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和健康对照的8岁至20岁儿童的抗扫视任务中的抑制缺陷,并检查与年龄相关的性能变化是否不同跨群体。除了常规的性能指标外,还使用瞳孔扩张来估计唤醒的相位和张力。结果表明,精神病组(而非多动症)的抗扫视错误率升高;但是,所有组的错误率差异均很大。这些抑制性失败伴随着较低水平的瞬时认知努力(如瞳孔扩张所指示)。对照组和临床组之间最大的差异不是在预期的抑制指标上,而是在纠正抑制错误的可能性和抗扫视反应时间的变异性上,这些相互关联。这些发现似乎不归因于在多动症的紊乱或缺乏动力的情况下在牢记任务指导方面的缺陷。取而代之的是,结果表明这两个临床组在逐个试验的基础上维持注意力都受到了损害,从而导致自我监测的缺陷。因此,结果显示在两种疾病中更普遍的注意障碍的情况下抑制性缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号