首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Admission rates in a general practitioner-based versus a hospital specialist based hospital-at-home model: ACCESS an open-labelled randomised clinical trial of effectiveness
【2h】

Admission rates in a general practitioner-based versus a hospital specialist based hospital-at-home model: ACCESS an open-labelled randomised clinical trial of effectiveness

机译:基于全科医生和医院专家的入院率模型的入院率:ACCESS这是一项开放标签的有效性随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundHospital at home (HaH) is an alternative to acute admission for elderly patients. It is unclear if should be cared for a primarily by a hospital intern specialist or by the patient’s own general practitioner (GP).The study assessed whether a GP based model was more effective than a hospital specialist based model at reducing number of hospital admissions without affecting the patient’s recovery or number of deaths.
机译:背景老年患者在家中医院(HaH)是急性入院的一种替代选择。目前尚不清楚是否应主要由医院实习医生或患者自己的全科医生(GP)进行护理。该研究评估了基于GP的模型在减少住院人数上是否比基于医院专家的模型更有效。影响患者的康复或死亡人数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号