首页> 外文学位 >Biopsychosocial-based versus behavioral-based parenting model: A clinical trial for adoptive parents with attachment-challenged children.
【24h】

Biopsychosocial-based versus behavioral-based parenting model: A clinical trial for adoptive parents with attachment-challenged children.

机译:基于生物心理社会学与基于行为学的育儿模型:针对有依恋挑战的孩子的养父母的临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compared three groups, 2 treatment groups and a control group, to examine whether caregivers who adopted children with attachment challenges from the foster care system would report behavioral changes in their adopted children after participating in parenting programs and which program was more effective. Children with attachment trauma historically have been treated using behavioral modification, forced eye contact, and talk therapy. The problem with traditional treatment is that it does not educate the caregiver about the underlying issues or the neurobiology of attachment trauma, which can cause the child to react out of need for survival. Historical treatment has also focused on controlling the child's behavior rather than helping the caregiver create a relationship with the child.In this study, two well-known parenting programs were tested: The Benjamin Interactive Parenting Model (BIPM), a biopsychosocial based model, and the Love and Logic Parenting model (LLP), a behavioral based model. The BIPM is based on the stress model of parenting, which addresses the neurology of a child after experiencing attachment trauma and incorporates caregivers' psychological introspection of their own historical traumas that can interfere with the attachment process. The BIPM adds an interactive component using kinesthetic bilateral stimulation as a means to build relationship between parent and child, as well as to enhance areas of the brain that are depleted when a child experiences trauma due to neglect or abuse. The behavioral model LLP integrates love and kindness in parenting skills while creating discipline through naturalistic consequences. Outcomes were measured by the Child Behavior Checklist and the Revised Adult Attachment Scale. A multivariate analysis of covariance showed that there were no significant differences in the caregivers' reports of children's behavior or in levels of attachment among the three groups after controlling the pretest differences.One major limitation of the study was that not enough time was allowed for complete changes in behavior or attachment to take place. Caregivers who attended the parenting programs did report feeling more confident in their parenting.
机译:这项研究比较了三个组(两个治疗组和一个对照组),以检查在寄养计划中领养来自寄养系统有依恋挑战的孩子的照料者是否会报告其领养孩子的行为变化,以及哪个方案更有效。从历史上看,患有附件创伤的儿童已经通过行为矫正,强迫眼神接触和谈话治疗得到了治疗。传统治疗的问题在于,它没有教育看护者关于潜在问题或依恋创伤的神经生物学的知识,而依恋可能会导致儿童出于生存需要做出反应。历史治疗也侧重于控制孩子的行为,而不是帮助照料者与孩子建立关系。在这项研究中,测试了两个著名的育儿计划:基于生物心理学的本杰明互动育儿模型(BIPM),以及爱与逻辑育儿模型(LLP),一种基于行为的模型。 BIPM基于育儿的压力模型,该模型解决儿童在经历依恋创伤后的神经病学问题,并结合了照顾者对其自身历史创伤的心理内省,这可能会影响依恋过程。 BIPM使用动觉性双侧刺激添加了一个互动组件,以建立父母与孩子之间的关系,并增强当孩子由于疏忽或虐待而遭受创伤时所消耗的大脑区域。行为模型LLP将爱心和仁慈融入了育儿技能中,同时通过自然主义的后果创造了纪律。结果通过儿童行为清单和修订后的成人依恋表进行测量。协方差的多变量分析表明,在控制了前测差异之后,三组的看护人关于儿童行为的报告或依恋水平没有显着差异。该研究的一个主要限制是,没有足够的时间来完成行为或依恋发生变化。参加育儿计划的看护人确实报告说对育儿感到更加自信。

著录项

  • 作者

    Benjamin, Janet L.;

  • 作者单位

    Alliant International University, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 Alliant International University, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral.Psychology Developmental.Psychology Clinical.Psychology Physiological.Biology Neurobiology.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:44

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号