首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Rating the quality of teamwork—a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies
【2h】

Rating the quality of teamwork—a comparison of novice and expert ratings using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in simulated emergencies

机译:对团队合作的质量进行评级-在模拟紧急情况下使用团队紧急评估方法(TEAM)对新手和专家的评级进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundTraining in teamwork behaviour improves technical resuscitation performance. However, its effect on patient outcome is less clear, partly because teamwork behaviour is difficult to measure. Furthermore, it is unknown who should evaluate it. In clinical practice, experts are obliged to participate in resuscitation efforts and are thus unavailable to assess teamwork quality. Consequently, we sought to determine if raters with little clinical experience and experts provide comparable evaluations of teamwork behaviour.
机译:背景团队行为的培训可以提高技术复苏的性能。但是,其对患者预后的影响尚不清楚,部分原因是团队行为难以衡量。此外,尚不清楚谁应该对其进行评估。在临床实践中,专家有义务参与复苏工作,因此无法评估团队合作质量。因此,我们试图确定缺乏临床经验的评估者和专家是否可以对团队行为进行类似的评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号