首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sarcoma >Intensified Adjuvant IFADIC Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Prospective Randomized Feasibility Trial
【2h】

Intensified Adjuvant IFADIC Chemotherapy for Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Prospective Randomized Feasibility Trial

机译:成人软组织肉瘤强化辅助治疗IFADIC化疗:前瞻性随机可行性试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. The present prospective randomized adjuvant trial was carried out to compare the toxicity, feasibility and efficacy of augmented chemotherapy added to hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy after wide or marginal resection of grade 2 and grade 3 soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and methods. Fifty-nine patients underwent primary surgery by wide or marginal excision and were subsequently randomized to receive radiotherapy alone or under the addition of six courses of ifosfamide (1500 mg/m2 , days 1–4), dacarbazine (DTIC) (200 mg/m2 , days 1–4) and doxorubicin (25 mg/m2 , days 1–2) administered in 14-day-intervals supported by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (30 × 106 IU/day, s.c.) on days 5–13. According to the randomization protocol, 28 patients received radiotherapy only, whereas 31 patients were treated with additional chemotherapy. Results. The relative ifosfamide–doxorubicin–DTIC (IFADIC) dose intensity achieved was 93%. After a mean observation period of 41±19.7 months (range, 8.1–84 months), 16 patients (57%) in the control group versus 24 patients (77%) in the chemotherapy group were free of disease (p>0.05).Within the control group, tumor relapses occurred in 12 patients (43%;six patients with distant metastases, two with local relapse, four with both) versus seven patients (23%; five patients with distant metastases, one with local recurrence, one with both) from the chemotherapy group. Relapse-free survival (RFS) (p=0.1), time to local failure (TLF) (p=0.09), time to distant failure (TDF) (p=0.17) as well as overall survival (OS) (p=0.4) did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Treatment-related toxicity was generally mild in both treatment arms. Conclusions. We conclude that the safety profile of intensified IFADIC added to radiotherapy was manageable and tolerable in the current setting. Inclusion of intensified IFADIC was not translated into a significant benefit concerning OS, RFS, TLF andTDF as compared with radiotherapy only, although a potential benefit of chemotherapy for grade 3 STS patients needs to be validated in prospective randomized trials including larger patient numbers.
机译:目的。进行本项前瞻性随机佐剂试验,以比较2级和3级软组织肉瘤(STS)广泛或边缘切除后加用超分割加速放疗的增强化疗的毒性,可行性和有效性。患者和方法。五十九例患者接受了广泛或边缘切除术,随后被随机分配接受放疗,或加用六疗程的异环磷酰胺(1500 mg / m2,第1-4天),达卡巴嗪(DTIC)(200 mg / m2) ,第1-4天)和阿霉素(25 mg / m2,第1-2天),在第14天间隔第13天以粒细胞集落刺激因子(30×106 IU /天,sc)支持,间隔14天。根据随机方案,仅28例接受放射治疗,而31例接受了额外的化疗。结果。异环磷酰胺-阿霉素-DTIC(IFADIC)的相对剂量强度为93%。在平均观察期为41±19.7个月(范围8.1-84个月)之后,对照组的16例患者(57%)与化疗组的24例患者(77%)没有疾病(p> 0.05)。在对照组中,发生肿瘤复发的有12例(43%; 6例有远处转移,2例有局部复发,4例同时有),而7例(23%; 5例有远处转移,1例有局部复发,1例有复发)。两者)来自化疗组。无复发生存期(RFS)(p = 0.1),局部衰竭时间(TLF)(p = 0.09),远距衰竭时间(TDF)(p = 0.17)以及总生存期(OS)(p = 0.4) )在两个治疗组之间没有显着差异。在两个治疗组中,与治疗相关的毒性通常较轻。结论。我们得出的结论是,在当前情况下,加至放射治疗的强化IFADIC的安全性是可控和可耐受的。与仅放疗相比,纳入强化IFADIC并未在OS,RFS,TLF和TDF方面带来显着益处,尽管需要在包括更多患者在内的前瞻性随机试验中验证化疗对3级STS患者的潜在益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号