首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia >HIP FRACTURE: POST-OPERATIVE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES
【2h】

HIP FRACTURE: POST-OPERATIVE EVALUATION OF CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES

机译:髋关节骨折:术后评估临床和功能结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes from patients undergoing surgery to treat hip fractures, with regard to the ASA score and time spent waiting for definitive surgical treatment. Method: Over a one-year period, 154 patients with hip fractures, aged 65 years and over, underwent operations. Data on the preoperative ASA score and the time spent waiting for the operation were obtained. Two years after the operation, Zuckerman‘s Functional Recovery Score (FRS) questionnaire was used to assess the patients' current functional capacity. Results: Mortality during the first postoperative year differed between patients with ASA 3 or 4 and those classified as ASA 1 or 2 (significant data; p < 0.05). Mortality up to the end of the second postoperative year was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the ASA 3 or 4 group. The preoperative ASA score did not demonstrate any significant relationship with the patients' current functional capacity (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference between the group operated within 48 hours of admission and the group operated after 48 hours, in relation to mortality or current functional capacity (p > 0.05). The group aged 80 years and over showed significantly higher mortality (p < 0.05) than the group aged 65 to 79 years up to the end of the second postoperative year. Conclusion: The preoperative ASA score and an age of 80 years or over may be considered to be factors associated with higher mortality two years after hip fracture surgery. In isolation, time spent waiting for surgery was not significant.
机译:目的:就ASA评分和等待明确手术治疗所花费的时间,评估接受手术治疗的髋部骨折患者的临床和功能结局。方法:在一年的时间里,对154例65岁及以上的髋部骨折患者进行了手术。获得有关术前ASA评分和等待手术所花费时间的数据。手术两年后,使用扎克曼的功能恢复评分(FRS)问卷来评估患者当前的功能能力。结果:ASA 3或4的患者与ASA 1或2的患者在术后第一年的死亡率有所不同(显着数据; p <0.05)。在ASA 3或4组中,术后第二年末的死亡率显着更高(p <0.05)。术前ASA评分与患者目前的功能能力无明显相关性(p> 0.05)。入院48小时内手术组与48小时后手术组在死亡率或当前功能方面无显着差异(p> 0.05)。到术后第二年末,年龄在80岁以上的组的死亡率显着高于65至79岁的组(p <0.05)。结论:术前ASA评分和80岁或80岁以上的年龄可能被认为是髋部骨折手术两年后死亡率较高的相关因素。孤立地看,等待手术所花费的时间并不多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号