首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Research Involvement and Engagement >‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research
【2h】

‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research

机译:值得吗?衡量患者和公众参与研究的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AbstractMuch of the current debate around the impact of patient/public involvement on research focuses on the lack of empirical data. While a number of systematic literature reviews have reported the various ways in which involvement makes a difference to research and the people involved, this evidence has been criticised as being weak and anecdotal. It is argued that robust evidence is still required. This review reflects on the use of quantitative approaches to evaluating impact. It concludes that the statistical evidence is weakened by not paying sufficient attention to the context in which involvement takes place and the way it is carried out. However, if scientific (systematic, quantitative, empirical) approaches are designed in a way to take these factors into account, they might not generate knowledge that is useful beyond the original context. Such approaches might not therefore enhance our understanding of when, why and how involvement makes a difference. In the context of individual research projects where researchers collaborate with patients/the public, researchers often acquire ‘new’ knowledge about life with a health condition. This new understanding can be described as experiential knowledge—‘knowledge in context’—that researchers gain through direct experience of working with patients/the public. On this basis, researchers’ accounts of their experience potentially provide a source of insight and learning to influence others, in the same way that the patient experience helps to shape research. These accounts could be improved by increasing the detail provided about context and mechanism. One of the most important contextual factors that influence the outcome of involvement is the researchers themselves and the skills, assumptions, values and priorities they start with. At the beginning of any research project, the researchers ‘don’t know what they don’t know’ until they involve patients/the public. This means that the impact of involvement within any particular project is somewhat unpredictable. The answer to the question ‘Is involvement worth doing?’ will always be ‘It depends’. Further exploration of the contextual and mechanistic factors which influence outcomes could give a stronger steer to researchers but may never accurately predict any specific impact.
机译:摘要当前有关患者/公众参与对研究影响的争论大多集中在缺乏经验数据上。虽然许多系统的文献综述已经报道了参与对研究和参与人员产生影响的各种方式,但该证据被批评为虚弱和轶事。有人认为仍然需要有力的证据。这项审查反映了使用定量方法来评估影响。结论是,没有充分注意参与的背景和实施方式,就会削弱统计证据。但是,如果以某种方式设计科学(系统,定量,经验)方法来考虑这些因素,则它们可能不会产生超出原始环境有用的知识。因此,这样的方法可能不会增进我们对参与何时,为什么以及如何产生影响的理解。在研究人员与患者/公众合作的个人研究项目中,研究人员通常会获得有关健康状况下生活的“新”知识。这种新的理解可以描述为经验知识,即“上下文相关知识”,研究人员通过与患者/公众合作的直接经验而获得。在此基础上,研究人员对自己经历的描述可能会提供一种洞察力和学习机会,从而影响他人,就像患者的经历有助于塑造研究一样。可以通过增加有关上下文和机制的详细信息来改进这些说明。影响参与结果的最重要的背景因素之一是研究人员本身以及他们的技能,假设,价值观和工作重点。在任何研究项目的开始,研究人员“不知道他们不知道的事情”,直到他们让患者/公众参与。这意味着参与任何特定项目的影响有些不可预测。 “参与值得吗?”这个问题的答案永远是“取决于”。对影响结果的情境和机制因素的进一步探索可能会给研究人员带来更大的掌控力,但可能永远无法准确预测任何具体影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号