首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pulmonary Circulation >Hemodynamic evidence of vascular remodeling in combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension
【2h】

Hemodynamic evidence of vascular remodeling in combined post- and precapillary pulmonary hypertension

机译:毛细血管扩张后和毛细血管合并肺动脉高压中血管重构的血流动力学证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although commonly encountered, patients with combined postcapillary and precapillary pulmonary hypertension (Cpc-PH) have poorly understood pulmonary vascular properties. The product of pulmonary vascular resistance and compliance, resistance-compliance (RC) time, is a measure of pulmonary vascular physiology. While RC time is lower in postcapillary PH than in precapillary PH, the RC time in Cpc-PH and the effect of pulmonary wedge pressure (PWP) on RC time are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that Cpc-PH has an RC time that resembles that in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) more than that in isolated postcapillary PH (Ipc-PH). We analyzed the hemodynamics of 282 consecutive patients with PH referred for right heart catheterization (RHC) with a fluid challenge from 2004 to 2013 (cohort A) and 4,382 patients who underwent RHC between 1998 and 2014 for validation (cohort B). Baseline RC time in Cpc-PH was higher than that in Ipc-PH and lower than that in PAH in both cohorts (P < 0.001). In cohort A, RC time decreased after fluid challenge in patients with Ipc-PH but not in those with PAH or Cpc-PH (P < 0.001). In cohort B, the inverse relationship of pulmonary vascular compliance and resistance, as well as that of RC time and PWP, in Cpc-PH was similar to that in PAH and distinct from that in Ipc-PH. Our findings demonstrate that patients with Cpc-PH have pulmonary vascular physiology that resembles that of patients with PAH more than that of Ipc-PH patients. Further study is warranted to identify determinants of vascular remodeling and assess therapeutic response in this subset of PH.
机译:尽管经常遇到,但合并毛细血管后和毛细血管前肺动脉高压(Cpc-PH)的患者对肺血管特性了解甚少。肺血管阻力和顺应性(阻力顺应性(RC)时间)的乘积是肺血管生理的量度。尽管毛细血管后PH的RC时间比毛细血管前PH的低,但Cpc-PH的RC时间和肺楔压(PWP)对RC时间的影响尚不清楚。我们测试了Cpc-PH的RC时间与孤立的毛细血管后PH(Ipc-PH)相比,在肺动脉高压(PAH)中的RC时间更多。我们分析了2004年至2013年间连续282例因体液刺激而进行右心导管(RHC)的PH患者的血液动力学(队列A)和1998年至2014年间接受RHC验证的4,382例患者(队列B)。在这两个队列中,Cpc-PH的基线RC时间均高于Ipc-PH的基线RC时间,且低于PAH的基线RC时间(P <0.001)。在队列A中,Ipc-PH患者在输液后RC时间减少,而PAH或Cpc-PH患者则没有(P <0.001)。在队列B中,Cpc-PH中肺血管顺应性和抵抗力的反比关系以及RC时间和PWP的反比关系与PAH中的相似,而与Ipc-PH的相反。我们的发现表明,Cpc-PH患者的肺血管生理学比Ipc-PH患者的肺血管生理学更像PAH患者。有必要进行进一步的研究来确定血管重塑的决定因素,并评估该部分PH中的治疗反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号