首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Sackler Colloquium on Digital Media and Developing Minds: How to play 20 questions with nature and lose: Reflections on 100 years of brain-training research
【2h】

Sackler Colloquium on Digital Media and Developing Minds: How to play 20 questions with nature and lose: Reflections on 100 years of brain-training research

机译:萨克勒数字媒体与发展思维研讨会:如何与自然界和失落者一起打20个问题:对脑训练研究100年的反思

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite dozens of empirical studies and a growing body of meta-analytic work, there is little consensus regarding the efficacy of cognitive training. In this review, we examine why this substantial corpus has failed to answer the often-asked question, “Does cognitive training work?” We first define cognitive training and discuss the general principles underlying training interventions. Next, we review historical interventions and discuss how findings from this early work remain highly relevant for current cognitive-training research. We highlight a variety of issues preventing real progress in understanding the underlying mechanisms of training, including the lack of a coherent theoretical framework to guide training research and methodological issues across studies and meta-analyses. Finally, suggestions for correcting these issues are offered in the hope that we might make greater progress in the next 100 y of cognitive-training research.
机译:尽管进行了许多实证研究,并且荟萃分析工作的人数在不断增长,但关于认知训练的功效尚无共识。在这篇评论中,我们研究了为什么这个庞大的语料库未能回答经常提出的问题“认知训练是否起作用?”我们首先定义认知训练,并讨论训练干预的基本原则。接下来,我们回顾历史干预措施,并讨论从早期工作中获得的发现如何与当前的认知训练研究保持高度相关。我们着重指出了妨碍理解培训基本机制的真正问题的各种问题,包括缺乏连贯的理论框架来指导培训研究以及跨研究和荟萃分析的方法论问题。最后,提出了纠正这些问题的建议,希望我们可以在未来100年的认知训练研究中取得更大的进步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号