【2h】

Legislative coalitions with incomplete information

机译:信息不完整的立法联盟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In most parliamentary democracies, proportional representation electoral rules mean that no single party controls a majority of seats in the legislature. This in turn means that the formation of majority legislative coalitions in such settings is of critical political importance. Conventional approaches to modeling the formation of such legislative coalitions typically make the “common knowledge” assumption that the preferences of all politicians are public information. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework to investigate which legislative coalitions form when politicians’ policy preferences are private information, not known with certainty by the other politicians with whom they are negotiating over what policies to implement. The model we develop has distinctive implications. It suggests that legislative coalitions should typically be either of the center left or the center right. In other words our model, distinctively, predicts only center-left or center-right policy coalitions, not coalitions comprising the median party plus parties both to its left and to its right.
机译:在大多数议会民主制中,比例代表制选举规则意味着没有一个政党可以控制立法机关的多数席位。反过来,这意味着在这种情况下成立多数立法联盟具有至关重要的政治意义。对这种立法联盟的形成进行建模的传统方法通常以“公知常识”为前提,即所有政客的偏好都是公共信息。在本文中,我们建立了一个理论框架,以调查当政客的政策偏好是私人信息时,哪些立法联盟形成了,而与他们协商实施什么政策的其他政客并不确定。我们开发的模型具有独特的含义。它建议立法联盟通常应位于左中或右中。换句话说,我们的模型独特地只预测中左政策联盟或中右政策联盟,而不预测由中位数政党加上左右两侧政党组成的联盟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号