首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Sackler Colloquium on Extension of Biology Through Culture: Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution
【2h】

Sackler Colloquium on Extension of Biology Through Culture: Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution

机译:萨克勒关于通过文化扩展生物学的座谈会:追求达尔文的好奇心:文化进化科学的前景

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the past few decades, scholars from several disciplines have pursued the curious parallel noted by Darwin between the genetic evolution of species and the cultural evolution of beliefs, skills, knowledge, languages, institutions, and other forms of socially transmitted information. Here, I review current progress in the pursuit of an evolutionary science of culture that is grounded in both biological and evolutionary theory, but also treats culture as more than a proximate mechanism that is directly controlled by genes. Both genetic and cultural evolution can be described as systems of inherited variation that change over time in response to processes such as selection, migration, and drift. Appropriate differences between genetic and cultural change are taken seriously, such as the possibility in the latter of nonrandomly guided variation or transformation, blending inheritance, and one-to-many transmission. The foundation of cultural evolution was laid in the late 20th century with population-genetic style models of cultural microevolution, and the use of phylogenetic methods to reconstruct cultural macroevolution. Since then, there have been major efforts to understand the sociocognitive mechanisms underlying cumulative cultural evolution, the consequences of demography on cultural evolution, the empirical validity of assumed social learning biases, the relative role of transformative and selective processes, and the use of quantitative phylogenetic and multilevel selection models to understand past and present dynamics of society-level change. I conclude by highlighting the interdisciplinary challenges of studying cultural evolution, including its relation to the traditional social sciences and humanities.
机译:在过去的几十年中,来自多个学科的学者追求了达尔文提出的奇怪的相似之处,即物种的遗传进化与信仰,技能,知识,语言,机构和其他形式的社会传播信息的文化进化。在这里,我回顾了在追求以生物和进化论为基础的文化进化科学方面的最新进展,但同时也将文化视为不仅仅是直接受基因控制的机制。遗传和文化进化都可以描述为遗传变异的系统,随着选择,迁移和漂移等过程而变化。认真对待遗传和文化变化之间的适当差异,例如在后者中进行非随机引导的变异或转化,混合遗传以及一对多传播的可能性。文化进化的基础是20世纪末期的人口微观遗传进化模型和利用系统进化方法重建文化宏观进化的基础。自那时以来,人们一直在努力理解累积文化进化背后的社会认知机制,人口统计学对文化进化的后果,假定的社会学习偏见的经验有效性,转化和选择性过程的相对作用以及定量系统发育的使用。和多层次选择模型,以了解过去和现在的社会层次变化动态。最后,我着重强调研究文化进化的跨学科挑战,包括其与传统社会科学和人文科学的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号