首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Establishing task- and modality-dependent dissociations between the semantic and default mode networks
【2h】

Establishing task- and modality-dependent dissociations between the semantic and default mode networks

机译:在语义和默认模式网络之间建立与任务和模式相关的分离

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The default mode network (DMN) and semantic network (SN) are two of the most extensively studied systems, and both are increasingly used as clinical biomarkers in neurological studies. There are strong theoretical reasons to assume a relationship between the networks, as well as anatomical evidence that they might rely on overlapping cortical regions, such as the anterior temporal lobe (ATL) or angular gyrus (AG). Despite these strong motivations, the relationship between the two systems has received minimal attention. We directly compared the SN and DMN using a large (n = 69) distortion-corrected functional MRI (fMRI) dataset, spanning a range of semantic and nonsemantic tasks that varied input modality. The results showed that both networks fractionate depending on the semantic nature of the task, stimulus type, modality, and task difficulty. Furthermore, despite recent claims that both AG and ATL are semantic hubs, the two areas responded very differently, with results supporting the role of ATL, but not AG, in semantic representation. Specifically, the left ATL was positively activated for all semantic tasks, but deactivated during nonsemantic task performance. In contrast, the left AG was deactivated for all tasks, with the level of deactivation related to task difficulty. Thus, ATL and AG do not share a common interest in semantic tasks, but, rather, a common “disinterest” in nonsemantic tasks. The implications for the variability in the DMN, its cognitive coherence, and interpretation of resting-state fMRI data are discussed.
机译:默认模式网络(DMN)和语义网络(SN)是研究最广泛的系统中的两个,并且都越来越多地用作神经学研究中的临床生物标记。有很强的理论理由假定网络之间存在关系,并且解剖学证据表明它们可能依赖于重叠的皮质区域,例如前颞叶(ATL)或角回(AG)。尽管有这些强烈的动机,但是两个系统之间的关系却很少受到关注。我们使用较大的(n = 69)畸变校正功能MRI(fMRI)数据集直接比较了SN和DMN,该数据集涵盖了各种输入模式不同的语义和非语义任务。结果表明,这两个网络根据任务的语义性质,刺激类型,方式和任务难度进行细分。此外,尽管最近声称AG和ATL都是语义中心,但这两个领域的响应却截然不同,结果支持ATL而不是AG在语义表示中的作用。具体来说,左ATL对于所有语义任务均被积极激活,但在非语义任务执行过程中被禁用。相反,左侧的AG对于所有任务均被停用,停用的程度与任务难度相关。因此,ATL和AG在语义任务上没有共同的兴趣,而在非语义任务中却有共同的“不感兴趣”。讨论了DMN的可变性,其认知连贯性以及对静止状态fMRI数据的解释的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号