【2h】

Unconscious inhibition separates two forms of cognitive control

机译:无意识抑制将两种形式的认知控制分开

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the human brain, cognitive-control processes are generally considered distinct from the unconscious mechanisms elicited by subliminal priming. Here, we show that cognitive control engaged in situations of response conflict interacts with the negative (inhibitory) phase of subliminal priming. Thus, cognitive control may surprisingly share common processes with nonconscious brain mechanisms. In contrast, our findings reveal that subliminal inhibition does not, however, interact with control adaptation—the supposed modulation of current control settings by previous experience of conflict. Therefore, although influential models have grouped immediate cognitive control and control adaptation together as products of the same conflict detection and control network, their relationship to subliminal inhibition separates them. Overall, these results suggest that the important distinction lies not between cognitive or top-down processes on the one hand and nonconscious priming mechanisms on the other hand but between responsive (poststimulus) mechanisms that deal with sensorimotor activation after it has occurred and preparatory (prestimulus) mechanisms that are modulated before stimulus arrival.
机译:在人脑中,通常认为认知控制过程不同于潜意识引发的潜意识机制。在这里,我们表明参与反应冲突情况的认知控制与潜意识启动的负(抑制)阶段相互作用。因此,认知控制可能会与无意识的大脑机制共享相同的过程。相反,我们的发现表明,潜意识抑制不会与控制适应相互作用-以前的冲突经验可能会导致对当前控制设置的调节。因此,尽管有影响力的模型将即时认知控制和控制适应归为同一冲突检测和控制网络的产物,但它们与潜意识抑制的关系将它们分开。总体而言,这些结果表明,重要的区别不在于一方面的认知或自上而下的过程与另一方面的无意识启动机制之间,而在于处理感觉运动激活后的反应性(后刺激)机制与准备性运动(刺激)之间的重要区别。 )在刺激到达之前已被调制的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号