首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Poverty and Hunger Special Feature: Governance and poverty reduction in Africa
【2h】

Poverty and Hunger Special Feature: Governance and poverty reduction in Africa

机译:贫困与饥饿专题:非洲的治理与减贫

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A careful review of the literature in political science and neighboring social science disciplines shows that prevailing assumptions in the international development policy community about improved governance as a principal mechanism to reduce poverty in Africa rests more on faith than science. Conventional policy models for tackling poverty fail to take into account the peculiar socioeconomic and political conditions in Africa, where the vast majority of those living on one dollar a day or less are only marginally captured by market and state institutions and instead rely on solving their problems “outside the system.” Poverty reduction through formal institutions therefore becomes ineffective. Although political science and other neighboring social science disciplines offer insights into these peculiarities, these contributions have been largely ignored to date. One reason is that economists continue to dominate the international development policy agenda. Another is that political scientists have typically looked at how economic variables shape political ones, rather than the other way around, as implied in the current governance agenda. Governance remains an undertheorized area of research held back by two chasms, one between economists and other social scientists and another between the scientific and the policy communities, to the detriment of gaining a better understanding of how it may help reduce poverty in Africa.
机译:对政治学和邻近社会科学学科的文献进行的仔细审查表明,国际发展政策界普遍认为,改善治理是减少非洲贫困的主要机制,其信念远胜于科学。消除贫困的常规政策模型没有考虑到非洲特殊的社会经济和政治条件,非洲每天生活费不足一美元的绝大多数人仅被市场和国家机构勉强吸收,而是依靠解决他们的问题“系统之外。”因此,通过正规机构减少贫困变得无效。尽管政治学和其他邻近的社会科学学科提供了对这些特殊性的见解,但迄今为止,这些贡献在很大程度上已被忽略。原因之一是经济学家继续主导国际发展政策议程。另一个是政治学家通常关注的是经济变量如何塑造政治变量,而不是像当前治理议程所暗示的那样反过来。治理仍然是一个理论不足的研究领域,受到两个障碍的阻碍,一个是经济学家与其他社会科学家之间的鸿沟,另一个是科学界与政策界之间的鸿沟,以至于无法更好地了解它如何帮助减少非洲的贫困。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号