首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) >Effectiveness of emergency physician determinations of the need for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke
【2h】

Effectiveness of emergency physician determinations of the need for thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke

机译:急诊医师确定急性脑卒中需要溶栓治疗的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An increased emphasis on stroke care has led to a proliferation of specialized stroke teams despite relatively few trials demonstrating their efficacy. Our academic stroke center incorporated a unique setup allowing for the comparison between stroke teams and emergency physicians. During weekday working hours, a stroke team would respond to the emergency department for stroke activations. During all other times, the emergency physician caring for the patient would make all treatment decisions. We sought to determine whether there was any difference in treatment and outcomes between these two groups. We conducted a retrospective review of all stroke activations from January 2015 to June 2016 and compared the thrombolytic administration rates, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge, and change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). A total of 415 stroke activations were identified. Of those, 69 of 262 patients (26.3%) seen by emergency physicians and 60 of 153 patients (39.2%) seen by neurologists received thrombolysis (P = 0.006). No significant difference was found in the discharge mRS or change in NIHSS between the two groups. Emergency physicians administered significantly less thrombolytics than did neurologists. No significant difference was observed in outcomes, including mRS and admission-to-discharge change in NIHSS.
机译:尽管相对较少的试验证明了中风治疗的有效性,但对中风治疗的重视却导致了中风专业队的增加。我们的学术中风中心采用了独特的设置,可以比较中风团队和急诊医师。在工作日的工作时间内,中风团队将响应紧急部门的中风激活要求。在所有其他时间,护理病人的急诊医师将做出所有治疗决定。我们试图确定这两组之间在治疗和结局方面是否存在差异。我们对2015年1月至2016年6月所有中风激活进行了回顾性研究,比较了溶栓给药率,出院时改良的Rankin量表(mRS)和国立卫生研究院中风量表(NIHSS)的变化。总共鉴定出415次中风激活。其中,急诊医师诊治的262例患者中有69例(26.3%),神经科医师诊治的153例患者中有60例(39.2%)接受了溶栓治疗(P = 0.006)。两组之间的放电mRS或NIHSS变化无明显差异。急诊医师施用的溶栓药明显少于神经科医师。在结局方面未观察到显着差异,包括mRS和NIHSS入院与出院的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号