首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders >Efficacy and Safety of Modafinil Film-Coated Tablets in Children and Adolescents With or Without Prior Stimulant Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Pooled Analysis of 3 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Studies
【2h】

Efficacy and Safety of Modafinil Film-Coated Tablets in Children and Adolescents With or Without Prior Stimulant Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Pooled Analysis of 3 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Studies

机译:莫达非尼薄膜衣片对有或没有事先兴奋剂治疗的注意力缺乏/多动障碍儿童和青少年的疗效和安全性:3项随机双盲安慰剂对照研究的汇总分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: This report evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria, who did or did not receive prior treatment with stimulants for ADHD by examining pooled data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.>Method: Three patient populations were evaluated: (1) all patients (i.e., all-patient group), (2) patients who were treated previously with stimulants (i.e., prior-stimulant group), and (3) patients who either were treated previously with ADHD medications other than stimulants or were not treated with any medications for ADHD (i.e., medication- or stimulantnaive group). Tolerability was evaluated by monitoring adverse events reported by both patients and parents. The 3 studies were conducted between November 2003 and June 2004.>Results: Of 638 patients randomized, 633 received modafinil (N = 420) or placebo (N = 213), 303 had received prior stimulant treatment (modafinil, 194; placebo, 109), and 330 had no prior stimulant experience (modafinil, 226; placebo, 104). Modafinil improved symptoms of ADHD, as assessed by ADHD-RS-IV School Version total scores (mean change from baseline to final visit compared with placebo) in the all-patient group (−16.4 vs. −8.3) (p < .0001), the prior-stimulant group (−14.2 vs. −9.3) (p < .001), and the medication-or stimulant-naive group (−18.3 vs. −7.3) (p < .0001). Similar improvements were observed on the ADHD-RS-IV Home Version and for overall clinical condition. Insomnia, headache, and decreased appetite were the most commonly reported adverse events. Discontinuation because of adverse events was similar in the modafinil and placebo groups (5% vs. 3%).>Conclusions: This post hoc analysis extends previous findings that modafinil was well tolerated and improved the symptoms and behaviors of ADHD at school and at home as assessed by teachers, parents, and clinicians and improved patients' overall clinical condition. Improvements were shown regardless of history of stimulant use.
机译:>目的:该报告评估了莫达非尼薄膜衣片对患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和青少年的疗效和耐受性,并根据DSM-IV-TR标准对其进行了诊断或诊断通过检查来自3项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照研究的汇总数据,未接受过ADHD兴奋剂的预先治疗。>方法:对三个患者群体进行了评估:(1)所有患者(即,所有-患者组),(2)先前接受过兴奋剂治疗的患者(即先前的兴奋剂组)和(3)先前接受过非兴奋剂以外的ADHD药物治疗或未接受过任何ADHD药物治疗的患者(即,药物或兴奋剂组)。通过监测患者和父母双方报告的不良事件来评估耐受性。这3项研究于2003年11月至2004年6月进行。>结果:在638例随机患者中,有633例接受了莫达非尼(N = 420)或安慰剂(N = 213),其中303例接受了先前的兴奋剂治疗(modafinil ,194;安慰剂109)和330没有刺激经验(莫达非尼226;安慰剂104)。通过全组患者的ADHD-RS-IV学校版总评分(与安慰剂相比,从基线到最终访视的平均变化)评估,莫达非尼改善了ADHD症状(-16.4比-8.3)(p <.0001) ,先刺激组(-14.2 vs -9.3)(p <.001)和未服用药物或刺激组(-18.3 vs -7.3)(p <.0001)。在ADHD-RS-IV家庭版和整体临床状况中也观察到了类似的改善。失眠,头痛和食欲不振是最常见的不良事件。莫达非尼和安慰剂组因不良事件而停药的情况相似(5%vs. 3%)。>结论:这项事后分析扩大了以前的发现,即莫达非尼耐受性良好,并改善了莫达非尼的症状和行为由老师,家长和临床医生评估,ADHD在学校和家庭中均可以改善患者的整体临床状况。无论使用刺激剂的历史如何,都显示出改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号