首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Preventing Chronic Disease >Peer Reviewed: Seeking Best Practices: A Conceptual Framework for Planning and Improving Evidence-Based Practices
【2h】

Peer Reviewed: Seeking Best Practices: A Conceptual Framework for Planning and Improving Evidence-Based Practices

机译:同行评审:寻求最佳实践:规划和改进循证实践的概念框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

How can we encourage ongoing development, refinement, and evaluation of practices to identify and build an evidence base for best practices? On the basis of a review of the literature and expert input, we worked iteratively to create a framework with 2 interrelated components. The first — public health impact — consists of 5 elements: effectiveness, reach, feasibility, sustainability, and transferability. The second — quality of evidence — consists of 4 levels, ranging from weak to rigorous. At the intersection of public health impact and quality of evidence, a continuum of evidence-based practice emerges, representing the ongoing development of knowledge across 4 stages: emerging, promising, leading, and best. This conceptual framework brings together important aspects of impact and quality to provide a common lexicon and criteria for assessing and strengthening public health practice. We hope this work will invite and advance dialogue among public health practitioners and decision makers to build and strengthen a diverse evidence base for public health programs and strategies.
机译:我们如何鼓励正在进行的实践开发,完善和评估,以识别和建立最佳实践的证据基础?在回顾文献和专家意见的基础上,我们反复努力创建了一个包含2个相互关联的组件的框架。第一个是公共卫生影响,包括5个要素:有效性,可及性,可行性,可持续性和可转让性。第二个-证据质量-包括4个级别,从弱到严格。在公共卫生影响和证据质量的交汇处,出现了一系列循证实践,代表了知识在四个阶段的不断发展:新兴,有前途,领先和最佳。该概念框架汇集了影响和质量的重要方面,为评估和加强公共卫生实践提供了通用的词汇和标准。我们希望这项工作将邀请并促进公共卫生从业者与决策者之间的对话,以建立和加强公共卫生计划和战略的多样化证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号