首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Postgraduate Medical Journal >A review of oesophageal manometry testing in a district general hospital
【2h】

A review of oesophageal manometry testing in a district general hospital

机译:区域综合医院食管测压检查的回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although several modalities are available to investigate oesophageal motility disorders, manometry is the gold standard. The procedure is increasingly available in district general hospitals but the clinical utility of this investigation in this setting remains unclear. The aim in this study was to evaluate the use and outcome of oesophageal manometry in a district general hospital. Data on 100 consecutive oesophageal manometry procedures were analysed, taking into account the referral pattern, indications, and results. The indications were gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (preoperative assessment before fundoplication) (58), dysphagia (28), chest pain (12), and epigastric pain (2). Diagnoses were made using predefined standard criteria and were as follows: normal (41), non-specific motility disorder (NSMD) (38), achalasia (15), diffuse oesophageal spasm (4), and scleroderma (2). Of the 58 patients who had undergone manometry as a preoperative assessment of oesophageal motility, 27 (47%) were abnormal. Twenty five (43%) had NSMD and two (3%) had achalasia. Forty eight of these preoperative cases were combined with 24 hour pH recording, which confirmed acid reflux in 35 (73%). The experience reported here reflects the published evidence that the use of manometry is changing. It is now more commonly used for assessment before antireflux surgery and for dysphagia, and the use in the assessment of chest pain is declining. The findings confirm the importance of eliminating achalasia before inappropriate antireflux surgery.
机译:尽管有几种方法可用于调查食道运动障碍,但测压是金标准。该程序在地区综合医院中越来越多,但是在这种情况下该研究的临床效用仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估地区综合医院食管测压的使用和结果。考虑转诊方式,适应症和结果,分析了100例连续食管测压程序的数据。适应症为胃食管反流病(胃底折叠术前术前评估)(58),吞咽困难(28),胸痛(12)和上腹痛(2)。使用预先确定的标准进行诊断,诊断标准如下:正常(41),非特异性运动障碍(NSMD)(38),门失弛缓(15),食道弥漫性食管痉挛(4)和硬皮病(2)。在术前评估过食管动力的58位患者中,有27位(47%)异常。 25名(43%)患有NSMD,而2名(3%)患有门失弛缓症。这些术前病例中有48例结合了24小时pH记录,这证实了35例胃酸倒流(73%)。此处报道的经验反映了压力测量法的使用正在发生变化的已公开证据。现在,它更常用于抗反流手术之前的评估和吞咽困难,并且用于评估胸痛的用途正在减少。这些发现证实了在不适当的抗反流手术之前消除门失弛缓症的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号