首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Parasite Epidemiology and Control >A sensitive species-specific reverse transcription real-time PCR method for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax
【2h】

A sensitive species-specific reverse transcription real-time PCR method for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax

机译:用于检测恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的灵敏物种特异性逆转录实时PCR方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the global burden of malaria decreases and countries strive towards disease elimination, there is a greater demand for sensitive diagnostics to target the submicroscopic reservoir of infection. We describe here a sensitive species-specific RT-qPCR method to differentiate between Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax infections at the submicroscopic level. With amplification of the 18S rRNA genes from total nucleic acids (both DNA and RNA), we discern P. falciparum and P. vivax with a limit of detection of 10 parasites/mL and 18 copies/μL, respectively. This assay was validated with 519 blood samples, negative by thick-smear, from febrile and asymptomatic cohorts from Colombia. These results were directly compared to a qPCR-based method (DNA only) as the gold standard. Of the samples from patients who presented with fever (n = 274), 34 infections were identified by RT-qPCR (16 P. falciparum, 15 P. vivax, and 3 mixed), of which only 10 infections were identified at the species level by qPCR. Within the asymptomatic cohort (n = 245), 13 infections were identified by RT-qPCR (3 P. falciparum, 3 P. vivax, and 7 mixed), whereas the species for only one infection was determined by qPCR. We conclude that this species-specific RT-qPCR method provides a more sensitive tool for species identification compared to DNA based qPCR methods.
机译:随着全球疟疾负担的减轻以及各国努力消除疾病,对针对亚显微感染源的敏感诊断的需求越来越大。我们在这里描述一种敏感的物种特异性RT-qPCR方法,以在亚显微水平上区分恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫感染。通过从总核酸(DNA和RNA)中扩增18S rRNA基因,我们可以辨别出恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫,其检出限分别为10个寄生虫/ mL和18个拷贝/μL。哥伦比亚的高热和无症状人群的519份血涂片涂片呈阴性,证实了该检测方法的有效性。将这些结果直接与基于qPCR的方法(仅DNA)作为金标准进行比较。在发烧患者(n = 274)的样本中,通过RT-qPCR鉴定出34种感染(16株恶性疟原虫,15株间日疟原虫和3种混合病原),其中仅10种在物种水平被鉴定出感染通过qPCR。在无症状队列中(n = 245),通过RT-qPCR鉴定出13种感染(3株恶性疟原虫,3株间日疟原虫和7株混合病),而仅一种感染的物种通过qPCR确定。我们得出的结论是,与基于DNA的qPCR方法相比,这种特定于物种的RT-qPCR方法为物种鉴定提供了更灵敏的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号