首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Pan African Medical Journal >Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle
【2h】

Evaluation des protocoles analgésiques pour la prise en charge de la douleur au cours de la lithotripsie extra corporelle

机译:评估体外碎石术中疼痛的镇痛方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-related pain is the largest limiting factor in this technique. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different types of analgesics for pain management used during ESWL sessions. We conducted a prospective study of 300 patients with urinary lithiasis justifying ESWL treatment. The patients were randomized to three groups: group I, included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of 2cc of physiological saline solution (placebo), group II included 100 patients who received intramuscular injection of ketoprofen 100mg while group III included 100 patients who received lidocaine and prilocaine topical cream. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used to assess pain 10 minutes after and at the end of the session. Mean VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was 3.7 and 4.91 respectively. There was no significant difference among the three groups with respect to: epidemiological data (age, sex, BMI, patient’s history) and the characteristics of the renal stone (side, size, location, presence or not of double-J ureteral catheter). Eleven patients in the Group I terminated treatment early, with a significant difference compared to the other groups (p=0.003). VAS score 10 minutes after and at the end of ESWL session was statistically higher in Group I compared to Groups II and III (p < 0.001). Moreover, ESWL session was significantly more effective in Groups (II and III) compared to Group I (p<0.001). Pain treatment is necessary during ESWL sessions. Two painkillers molecules were assessed, which showed good pain control as well as an increase in the effectiveness of lithotripsy.
机译:体外冲击波碎石相关的疼痛是该技术的最大限制因素。我们的研究旨在比较在ESWL疗程中使用的不同类型止痛药对疼痛控制的有效性。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,对300例尿结石患者进行ESWL治疗。将患者随机分为三组:第一组包括100例肌肉注射2cc生理盐水溶液(安慰剂)的患者,第二组包括100例肌肉注射酮洛芬100mg的患者,第三组包括100例接受利多卡因的患者。丙胺卡因局部乳膏。视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估手术后10分钟和手术结束时的疼痛。在ESWL会话结束后10分钟和结束时,VAS平均得分分别为3.7和4.91。三组之间在流行病学数据(年龄,性别,BMI,患者病史)和肾结石的特征(侧面,大小,位置,是否存在双J输尿管)方面无显着差异。第一组中的11名患者较早终止治疗,与其他组相比有显着差异(p = 0.003)。与第二组和第三组相比,第一组ESWL课后和结束后10分钟的VAS评分在统计学上较高(p <0.001)。此外,与第一组相比,第二组和第三组的ESWL疗程明显更有效(p <0.001)。 ESWL疗程期间必须进行疼痛治疗。评估了两种止痛药分子,它们显示出良好的疼痛控制以及碎石术的有效性增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号