首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences >Effects of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting on high-risk carotid stenosis patients
【2h】

Effects of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting on high-risk carotid stenosis patients

机译:颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术对高危颈动脉狭窄患者的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: To analyze the clinical effects and safety of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of high-risk carotid stenosis patients. >Methods: Total 63 patients who underwent CEA or CAS in our hospitals from January 2007 to December 2012 were selected in this study, and were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group. The patients in the observation group were subjected to CAS and those in the control group were subjected to CEA to compare the primary and secondary endpoints of the treatment. >Results: The arrival rates of the primary and secondary endpoints were 7.14% and 10.71% respectively in the observation group, while those were 11.43% and 11.43% respectively in the control group. There were no significant differences in the arrival rates of primary and secondary endpoints between the two groups (P>0.05). >Conclusion: The efficacies and safety of CAS and CEA are similar in treating high-risk carotid stenosis patients.
机译:>目的:分析颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)在高危颈动脉狭窄患者中的临床疗效和安全性。 >方法:本研究选取2007年1月至2012年12月在我院接受CEA或CAS的63例患者,随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组患者接受CAS治疗,对照组患者接受CEA治疗,以比较治疗的主要终点和次要终点。 >结果:观察组主要终点和次要终点的到达率分别为7.14%和10.71%,而对照组分别为11.43%和11.43%。两组主要终点和次要终点的到达率无显着差异(P> 0.05)。 >结论: CAS和CEA在治疗高风险颈动脉狭窄患者中的疗效和安全性相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号