首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncotarget >Pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition grafts for cancer: a meta-analysis
【2h】

Pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition grafts for cancer: a meta-analysis

机译:胰十二指肠切除术联合门静脉上肠系膜静脉切除术及间置移植物重建癌的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of interposition grafts for portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV-SMV) reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with venous resection (VR) for localized periampullary tumors is a controversial topic. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients who received interposition grafts for PV-SMV reconstruction after PD with VR. The correlative databases were systematically searched to identify relevant trials comparing vein grafts versus no vein grafts during PD with VR. 14 studies including 257 patients with vein grafts and 570 patients without vein grafts were extracted. The meta-analysis indicated no difference in perioperative morbidity, mortality, or thrombosis between the two groups, but the vein graft group was associated with a significantly increased venous thrombosis rate (≥ 6 months) (odds ratio [OR] = 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32–5.73; P = .007). The autologous vein group subgroup analysis also revealed a significantly increased vein thrombosis rate (OR = 3.13; 95% CI, 1.45–6.76; P = .004) between the two groups. Meanwhile, the prosthetic vein group subgroup analysis indicated no difference. Additionally, the oncological value of vein grafts during PD for pancreatic cancer survival was analyzed and revealed no difference in 1-year, 3-year, or 5-year survival between the two groups. Using interposition grafts for PV-SMV reconstruction is safe and effective, and has perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates compared to those with no vein grafts during PD with VR. However, the lower long-term vein patency rate in patients with vein grafts indicate that interposition grafts may be more likely to lose function.
机译:胰腺十二指肠切除术(PD)静脉切除术(VR)介入治疗局部壶腹周围肿瘤时,间插移植物用于门上系膜上静脉(PV-SMV)的重建是一个有争议的话题。本荟萃分析旨在评估接受VR的PD后接受介入植体进行PV-SMV重建的患者的围手术期和长期预后。系统地搜索相关数据库,以鉴定相关试验,比较PD伴VR期间的静脉移植与无静脉移植。提取了14个研究,包括257例有静脉移植的患者和570例无静脉移植的患者。荟萃分析表明,两组的围手术期发病率,死亡率或血栓形成无差异,但静脉移植组的静脉血栓形成率显着增加(≥6个月)(优势比[OR] = 2.75; 95%置信区间[CI],1.32-5.73; P = .007)。自体静脉组亚组分析还显示两组之间的静脉血栓形成率显着增加(OR = 3.13; 95%CI,1.45-6.76; P = .004)。同时,假肢静脉亚组分析显示无差异。此外,分析了PD期间移植静脉对胰腺癌存活的肿瘤学价值,发现两组之间的1年,3年或5年存活率无差异。与使用VR的PD期间无静脉移植的患者相比,使用介入移植物进行PV-SMV重建是安全有效的,并且具有围手术期的结果和长期生存率。但是,静脉移植物患者的长期静脉通畅率较低,表明介入移植物可能更容易丧失功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号