首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Food-Insecure Household’s Self-Reported Perceptions of Food Labels Product Attributes and Consumption Behaviours
【2h】

Food-Insecure Household’s Self-Reported Perceptions of Food Labels Product Attributes and Consumption Behaviours

机译:粮食不安全家庭对食品标签产品属性和消费行为的自我报告看法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dietary compromises related to food insecurity profoundly undermine health and constitute a serious public health issue, even in developed nations. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of food labelling and product attributes on the purchasing choices of food-insecure households in Australia. An online survey containing 19 food choice and 28 purchasing behaviours questions was completed by 1056 adults responsible for household grocery shopping. The short form of the US Household Food Security Survey Module was used as the food security indicator. Multinomial logistic regression modelling was employed to analyse the survey data. Respondents were classified as having either high-marginal (63.4%, n = 670), low (19.8%, n = 209) or very low (16.8%, n = 177) food security. Respondents with low or very low food security status were less likely to self-report understanding the information on the back of packaging (p < 0.001), find information on food labels useful (p = 0.002) or be influenced by product nutrition information (p = 0.002). Convenience (p < 0.001), organic (p = 0.027) and supermarket-branded products (p < 0.001) were more likely to be rated as important by food-insecure respondents when compared to their food-secure counterparts. When asked to rate “how healthy” their diet was, high–marginal FS respondents were twice as likely describe their diet as healthy than very low FS respondents (p = 0.001).
机译:与粮食不安全有关的饮食妥协极大地损害了健康,并构成了严重的公共卫生问题,即使在发达国家也是如此。这项研究的目的是探讨食品标签和产品属性对澳大利亚粮食不安全家庭的购买选择的影响。 1056名负责家庭杂货店购物的成年人完成了包含19种食物选择和28种购买行为问题的在线调查。美国家庭食品安全调查模块的简称用作食品安全指标。采用多项逻辑回归模型分析调查数据。受访者的食品安全性偏高(63.4%,n = 670),低(19.8%,n = 209)或极低(16.8%,n = 177)。处于较低或极低食品安全状态的受访者不太可能自我报告,以了解包装背面的信息(p <0.001),发现有用的食品标签信息(p = 0.002)或受产品营养信息的影响(p = 0.002)。与食品安全相对应的受访者相比,食品安全较弱的受访者将便利(p <0.001),有机食品(p = 0.027)和超市品牌产品(p <0.001)评为重要。当被要求对饮食的“健康程度”进行评分时,高边缘FS受访者将其饮食描述为健康的可能性是非常低FS受访者的两倍(p = 0.001)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号