首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda
【2h】

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda

机译:利益相关者对碘生物强化的认识:乌干达北部的SWOT-AHP分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Agronomic biofortification (i.e., the application of fertilizer to elevate micronutrient concentrations in staple crops) is a recent strategy recommended for controlling Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDDs). However, its success inevitably depends on stakeholders’ appreciation and acceptance of it. By taking Northern Uganda as a case, this study aimed to capture and compare the perceptions of seven key stakeholder groups with respect to agronomic iodine biofortification. Therefore, we employed a SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats) analysis in combination with an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Findings show that stakeholders (n = 56) are generally positive about agronomic iodine biofortification in Uganda, as its strengths and opportunities outweighed weaknesses and threats. Cultural acceptance and effectiveness are considered the most important strengths while the high IDD prevalence rate and the availability of iodine deficient soils are key opportunities for further developing agronomic iodine biofortification. Environmental concerns about synthetic fertilizers as well as the time needed to supply iodine were considered crucial weaknesses. The limited use of fertilizer in Uganda was the main threat. While this study provides insight into important issues and priorities for iodine biofortification technology in Uganda, including differences in stakeholder views, the application of the SWOT-AHP method will guide future researchers and health planners conducting stakeholder analysis in similar domains.
机译:农业生物强化(即在化肥中施用肥料以提高微量营养素浓度)是控制碘缺乏病(IDD)的最新策略。然而,它的成功不可避免地取决于利益相关者的赞赏和接受。本研究以乌干达北部为例,旨在捕获和比较七个主要利益相关者群体对农用碘生物强化的看法。因此,我们结合了层次分析法(AHP)进行了SWOT(优势,劣势,机会和威胁)分析。研究结果表明,利益相关者(n = 56)对乌干达的农业碘强化生物技术普遍持积极态度,因为其优势和机遇胜过了弱点和威胁。文化接受度和有效性被认为是最重要的优势,而高IDD患病率和缺碘土壤的可用性是进一步发展农业碘生物强化的关键机会。关于合成肥料的环境问题以及供应碘的时间被认为是关键的弱点。乌干达有限使用化肥是主要威胁。尽管本研究提供了对乌干达碘生物强化技术的重要问题和优先事项的见识,包括利益相关者观点的差异,但SWOT-AHP方法的应用将指导未来的研究人员和卫生计划人员在类似领域进行利益相关者分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号