首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >Menu Planning in Residential Aged Care—The Level of Choice and Quality of Planning of Meals Available to Residents
【2h】

Menu Planning in Residential Aged Care—The Level of Choice and Quality of Planning of Meals Available to Residents

机译:养老院中的菜单规划-居民可用膳食的选择水平和质量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Choice of food is an imperative aspect of quality of life for residents in Residential Aged Care Homes (RACHs), where overall choice and control is diminished upon entering a home to receive care. The purpose of this study was to examine the current strategies of menu planning in a range of RACHs in Australia, and whether this facilitated appropriate levels of choice for residents receiving texture modified and general diets. Methods: The study comprised a National Menu Survey using a new survey instrument collecting general information about the RACH and foodservice system, menu information and staffing information (n = 247); a national menu analysis (n = 161) and an observational case study of 36 meal environments. Results: Choice was low for the entire sample, but particularly for those receiving pureed texture modified diets. Evidence of menu planning to facilitate the inclusion of choice and alternatives was limited. Discussion: Regulation and monitoring of the Australian Aged Care Accreditation Standards needs to be strengthened to mandate improvement of the choice and variety offered to residents, particularly those on pureed texture modified diets. Further research on how menu choice and a lack of variety in meals affects the quality of life residents is needed in this context, but current evidence suggests the effect would be detrimental and undermine resident autonomy and nutritional status.
机译:背景:食物的选择对于老年人养老院(RACH)的居民而言是生活质量的当务之急,那里的总体选择和控制权在进入养老院后就减少了。这项研究的目的是研究澳大利亚各种RACH中菜单规划的当前策略,以及这是否为接受质地改良和普通饮食的居民提供了适当的选择水平。方法:该研究包括一项使用新调查工具的全国菜单调查,该工具收集有关RACH和食品服务系统的一般信息,菜单信息和人员配备信息(n = 247);国家菜单分析(n = 161)和36种用餐环境的观察案例研究。结果:整个样本的选择量很低,但对于那些采用纯组织质地的饮食的人尤其如此。菜单规划促进选择和替代方案纳入的证据有限。讨论:需要加强对澳大利亚老年护理认证标准的监管和监督,以强制改善向居民提供的选择和品种,尤其是那些采用纯正质地改良饮食的居民。在这种情况下,需要进一步研究菜单选择和餐食种类的多样性如何影响居民的生活质量,但目前的证据表明,这种影响将是有害的,并损害居民的自主权和营养状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号