首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nursing Research and Practice >The Conceptualization and Measurement of Comorbidity: A Review of the Interprofessional Discourse
【2h】

The Conceptualization and Measurement of Comorbidity: A Review of the Interprofessional Discourse

机译:合并症的概念化和量度:专业间话语回顾

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Chronic medical conditions often occur in combination. Understanding underlying mechanisms causing diseases and their interactions may make it possible to address multiple complex conditions with single or consolidated treatment approaches and improve patients' health outcomes while reducing costs. Objectives. We present a synthesis of the current interprofessional discourse on the issues surrounding comorbidities. Methods. A targeted review of the literature was conducted using published editorials, commentaries, and review articles. Results. Errors in conceptualization and measurement plague our current understanding of comorbidities. Two potential paths to generating knowledge involve the use of etiological or epidemiological approach. An etiological approach investigates the risk factors and underlying mechanisms potentially leading to consolidation of diagnosis and treatments. Because of the rudimentary stage of knowledge development in this area, this approach will require time and significant research investments. In contrast, the epidemiological approach relies on statistical identification of disease entities that cooccur beyond random chance; this approach carries an accompanying risk of diagnostic and treatment proliferation. Discussion. The concept of comorbidity, its nature, and measurement is in need of meaningful debate by the scientific and clinical communities. Recommendations in the domains of conceptualization, research, and measurement are discussed.
机译:背景。慢性医学病常合并发生。了解引起疾病及其相互作用的潜在机制,可以通过单一或综合治疗方法解决多种复杂疾病,并在降低成本的同时改善患者的健康状况。目标。我们对有关合并症的当前跨专业的论述进行了综述。方法。使用出版的社论,评论和评论文章进行有针对性的文献回顾。结果。概念化和测量方面的错误困扰着我们目前对合并症的理解。产生知识的两种潜在途径涉及病因学或流行病学方法的使用。病因学方法调查了可能导致合并诊断和治疗的危险因素和潜在机制。由于该领域知识发展的初级阶段,这种方法将需要时间和大量的研究投资。相比之下,流行病学方法依靠的是对随机以外机会共存的疾病实体进行统计鉴定。这种方法伴随着诊断和治疗扩散的风险。讨论。合并症的概念,性质和测量方法需要科学界和临床界进行有意义的辩论。讨论了概念化,研究和测量领域中的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号