首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neuro-Oncology >RT-13OPTIMIZING RADIATION THERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USING DIFFERENT MRI MODALITIES TO MINIMIZE RADIATION INJURY
【2h】

RT-13OPTIMIZING RADIATION THERAPY FOR GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USING DIFFERENT MRI MODALITIES TO MINIMIZE RADIATION INJURY

机译:RT-13优化胶质母细胞瘤患者的放射治疗:使用不同的MRI手段减少放射损伤的对比研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common and lethal primary malignant brain tumor and radiation therapy is considered the standard of care in the adjuvant setting. Current radiation treatment planning guidelines recommend FLAIR MRI sequence with a 2 cm margin to encompass the subclinical tumor spread. However, the FLAIR modality extensively visualizes the surrounding edema, possibly leading to unnecessary radiation toxicity to healthy brain tissue. We hypothesize that we can optimize radiation therapy by using alternative MRI modalities or by decreasing clinical tumor volume margins to minimize toxicity without compromising accurate tumor targeting. We retrospectively collected data for 21 patients with pathology confirmed recurrence and created radiation treatment plans using ADC, ADC without FLAIR shine-through (ADCst), DWI, T1, and FLAIR. For the FLAIR both a 1 cm and 2 cm margin was used (FLAIR1 and FLAIR2). Boolean operators were used to calculate the accuracy of targeting tumor recurrence and excessive radiation volume compared to the standard FLAIR2 treatment plan. All MRI modalities had complete coverage of the recurrent tumor and the mean differences in accuracy between the different MRI modalities and FLAIR2 was not significant. However, there was a significant reduction in the excessive radiation volume compared to FLAIR2. ADCst had a 51.3% reduction, DWI 42.3%, T1 42.6%, and FLAIR1 44.6% reduction of excessive radiation volume compared to FLAIR2 (p < 0.05). ADC did not have a significant reduction of excessive radiation volume compared to FLAIR2. Our data support the hypothesis that using MRI modalities other than the standard FLAIR or decreasing the margin by 1cm may optimize radiation therapy for GBM patients by reducing unnecessary radiation dose to healthy brain tissue without compromising accuracy. By using new MRI modalities in radiation treatment planning or modifying clinical tumor volume margins we can decrease radiation toxicity to patients to improve their quality of life.
机译:多形胶质母细胞瘤是最常见的致死性原发性恶性脑肿瘤,放射治疗被认为是辅助治疗的标准治疗方法。当前的放射治疗计划指南建议使用2厘米空白的FLAIR MRI序列,以涵盖亚临床肿瘤扩散。但是,FLAIR装置可广泛可视化周围的水肿,可能导致对健康脑组织的不必要的辐射毒性。我们假设我们可以通过使用替代性MRI方式或通过减少临床肿瘤体积余量以最大程度地降低毒性而又不影响准确的肿瘤靶向来优化放射治疗。我们回顾性收集了21例经病理证实的复发患者的数据,并使用ADC,无FLAIR透视(ADCst),DWI,T1和FLAIR的ADC制定了放射治疗计划。对于FLAIR,使用了1 cm和2 cm的边距(FLAIR1和FLAIR2)。与标准FLAIR2治疗计划相比,布尔运算符用于计算靶向肿瘤复发和过量放射量的准确性。所有MRI方式均已完全覆盖了复发性肿瘤,并且不同MRI方式与FLAIR2之间的准确性均值差异不显着。但是,与FLAIR2相比,过多的辐射量有了明显的减少。与FLAIR2相比,ADCst的过量辐射量减少了51.3%,DWI减少了42.3%,T1减少了42.6%,FLAIR1减少了44.6%(p <0.05)。与FLAIR2相比,ADC没有明显减少过多的辐射量。我们的数据支持这样的假设,即使用标准FLAIR以外的MRI方式或将边缘减少1cm可以通过减少对健康大脑组织的不必要放射剂量而不会损害准确性来优化GBM患者的放射治疗。通过在放射治疗计划中使用新的MRI方式或修改临床肿瘤体积余量,我们可以降低对患者的放射毒性,从而改善他们的生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号