首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy >TEMPORAL EFFICACY OF KINESIOLOGY TAPE VS. TRADITIONAL STRETCHING METHODS ON HAMSTRING EXTENSIBILITY
【2h】

TEMPORAL EFFICACY OF KINESIOLOGY TAPE VS. TRADITIONAL STRETCHING METHODS ON HAMSTRING EXTENSIBILITY

机译:运动学磁带的时间效率VS.传统拉伸方法对腿部伸展性的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe epidemiology and aetiology of hamstring injuries in sport have been well documented. Kinesiology tape has been advocated as a means of improving muscle flexibility, with potential implications for injury prevention. Purpose: To compare the temporal pattern of efficacy of kinesiology tape and traditional stretching techniques on hamstring extensibility. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirty recreationally active male participants (Mean ± SD: age 21.0 ± 0.1 years; height 180 ± 6 cm; mass 79.4 ± 6.9 kg) completed an active knee extension assessment (of the dominant leg) as a measure of hamstring extensibility. Three experimental interventions of equal time duration were applied in randomized order: Kinesiology tape (KT), static stretch (SS), proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). Measures were taken at baseline, +1, +10 and +30 mins after each intervention. The temporal pattern of change in active knee extension (AKE) was modelled as a range of regression polynomials for each intervention, quantified as the regression coefficient. Results: With baseline scores not statistically different between groups, and baseline AKE set at 100%, PNF showed a significant improvement immediately post‐intervention (PNF+1 = 107.7 ± 8.2%, p = .01). Thereafter, only KT showed significant improvements in active knee extension (KT+10 = 106.0 ± 7.1%, p = .05; KT+30 = 106.9 ± 5.0%, p = .02). The temporal pattern of changes in active knee extension after intervention was best modelled as a positive quadratic for KT, with a predicted peak of 108.8% baseline score achieved at 24.2 mins. SS was best modelled as a negative linear function, and PNF as a negative logarithmic function, reflecting a rapid decrease in active knee extension after an immediate positive effect. Conclusion: Each intervention displayed a unique temporal pattern of changes in active knee extension. PNF was best suited to affect immediate improvements in hamstring extensibility, whereas kinesiology tape offered advantages over a longer duration. Clinical Relevance: The logistics of the sporting or clinical context will often dictate the delay between intervention and performance. Our findings have implications for the timing and choice of intervention aimed at increasing hamstring extensibility in relation to performance.
机译:背景运动中绳肌损伤的流行病学和病因学已得到充分记录。运动学胶带被提倡作为改善肌肉柔韧性的手段,对预防伤害具有潜在意义。目的:比较运动学胶带和传统拉伸技术对绳肌可伸展性的时间效用模式。研究设计:受控实验室研究。方法:30名娱乐活动活跃的男性参与者(平均值±标准偏差:年龄21.0±0.1岁;身高180±6厘米;质量79.4±6.9千克)完成了(占优势腿的)主动膝盖伸展评估,以评估绳肌的伸展性。以随机顺序应用了三种持续时间相等的实验性干预措施:人体运动学带(KT),静态拉伸(SS),本体感觉神经肌肉促进(PNF)。在每次干预后的基线,+ 1,+ 10和+30分钟时采取措施。主动膝盖伸展(AKE)的时间变化模式被建模为每种干预措施的一系列回归多项式,量化为回归系数。结果:各组之间的基线评分无统计学差异,基线AKE设为100%,干预后PNF立即显示显着改善(PNF + 1 = 107.7±8.2%,p = .01)。此后,只有KT在活动性膝关节伸展方面显示出显着改善(KT + 10 = 106.0±7.1%,p = .05; KT + 30 = 106.9±5.0%,p = .02)。干预后活动膝关节伸展的时间变化模式最好模拟为KT的二次方,预测峰值在24.2分钟达到108.8%。最好将SS建模为负线性函数,将PNF建模为负对数函数,这反映了在立即产生积极效果后,主动膝关节伸展迅速减少。结论:每种干预措施均显示出活动性膝关节伸展变化的独特时间模式。 PNF最适合影响腿筋可扩展性的立即改善,而运动机能学带则可在更长的时间内提供优势。临床意义:体育或临床背景的后勤往往会决定干预与表现之间的延迟。我们的发现对旨在提高绳肌可伸展性相对于表现的干预措施的时机和选择具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号