首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Movement Disorders Clinical Practice >Validity and Efficacy of Screening Algorithms for Assessing Deep Brain Stimulation Candidacy in Parkinsons Disease
【2h】

Validity and Efficacy of Screening Algorithms for Assessing Deep Brain Stimulation Candidacy in Parkinsons Disease

机译:评估帕金森氏病深部脑刺激候选者的筛选算法的有效性和有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

DBS for Parkinson's disease (PD) may be underutilized because of limited access to care (most DBS surgeries are performed at specialized centers) or over‐referral of poor candidates, leading to inequitable utilization of limited evaluative resources. There is a pressing need for a widely employable screening algorithm to aid in the evaluation of PD candidates for DBS. The aim of this study was to compare the validity and efficacy of two published screening algorithms, the Florida Surgical Questionnaire for PD and Stimulus, to predict candidacy for DBS. We reviewed the clinical data at our DBS center for 147 consecutive PD DBS referrals between 1 September 2007 and 31 December 2011. Florida Surgical Questionnaire and Stimulus scores were applied retrospectively through a chart review of the movement disorder neurologist's initial clinical evaluation. The validity and accuracy of these two algorithms in predicting candidacy for DBS was compared to the decision to offer DBS surgery by our multidisciplinary DBS team. Of the 130 consecutive PD referrals who presented for initial evaluation, 50 were offered DBS after a standardized multidisciplinary evaluation. The Stimulus scale was a superior screening tool for predicting PD DBS candidacy in these referrals (area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] = 0.8088), compared to the Florida Surgical Questionnaire for style="fixed-case">PD ( style="fixed-case">AUROC = 0.6285). In this single‐center study, Stimulus was a more appropriate screening measure than the Florida Surgical Questionnaire for style="fixed-case">PD to assess style="fixed-case">DBS candidacy for style="fixed-case">PD.
机译:DBS用于帕金森氏病(PD)的使用可能因未得到足够的护理(大多数DBS手术均在专门中心进行)或过分推荐较差的候选人而未得到充分利用,从而导致有限评估资源的不公平利用。迫切需要一种可广泛使用的筛选算法,以帮助评估DBS的PD候选物。这项研究的目的是比较两种已发表的筛查算法(PD和刺激物的佛罗里达外科问卷)的有效性和有效性,以预测DBS的候选资格。我们在2007年9月1日至2011年12月31日期间,在我们的DBS中心回顾了147个连续的PD DBS转诊的临床数据。通过对运动障碍神经病学家的初步临床评估进行图表回顾,回顾性地应用了佛罗里达外科问卷和刺激评分。将这两种算法在预测DBS候选资格方面的有效性和准确性与我们多学科DBS团队提供DBS手术的决定进行了比较。在提交给初次评估的130个连续的PD推荐中,有50个在经过标准化的多学科评估后获得了DBS。与 style =“ fixed-case”> PD span>( style =“ fixed-case”> AUROC = 0.6285)。在这项单中心研究中,对于 style =“ fixed-case”> PD 来评估 style =“ fixed-case”> DBS ,与佛罗里达手术问卷相比,刺激是更合适的筛查手段。 span> style =“ fixed-case”> PD 的候选资格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号