首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Andrology and Urology >Single postoperative instillation for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: are there still any indication?
【2h】

Single postoperative instillation for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: are there still any indication?

机译:非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的术后单次滴注:是否仍有适应症?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Intravesical chemotherapeutical agents after transurethral resection have shown to be effective in reducing the risk of recurrence and progression during the follow up. Specifically, an early single chemotherapeutical instillation (SI) might play an important role but the efficacy of this treatment has been questioned. For these reasons, we sought to review and summarize the current evidence with a non-systematic Medline/PubMed literature search. Level 1a evidence strongly supports the utility of SI in reducing recurrence in low-intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, with about 35% of relative reduction rates in patients with single, <3 cm and low-intermediate stage and grade tumors. The efficacy of this procedure is particularly evident when epirubicin or mitomycin C is administered. However, no randomized controlled trials compared the effect of the different types of drugs for SI. Only few trials have analyzed the effect of timing in SI, therefore, the optimal delivery timeframe is not yet completely clear with some series suggesting that a delivery within the first 2 hours after surgery might have an impact on recurrence rates and others that show no differences with those treated within 24 hours. None of the patients included in the randomized controlled trials analyzed in this review suffered from systemic toxicity. On the other hand, other side effects were recorded, including: chemical cystitis and skin reaction. Although it is a safe procedure, rare severe complications have been reported in the literature, mostly due to extravasation of drugs in patients who underwent extended resection or bladder perforation. To avoid potential deadly complications, SI should not be administered in these patients.
机译:经尿道切除后膀胱内化疗药物已显示可有效减少随访期间复发和进展的风险。具体而言,早期单次化学滴注(SI)可能起重要作用,但是这种治疗的有效性受到质疑。由于这些原因,我们试图通过非系统的Medline / PubMed文献搜索来回顾和总结当前证据。 1a级证据有力地支持了SI在降低低中度风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)患者的复发中的效用,对于单发,<3 cm和低中度分期,等级肿瘤。当施用表柔比星或丝裂霉素C时,此过程的功效特别明显。但是,没有随机对照试验比较不同类型药物对SI的作用。仅有少数试验分析了SI时机的影响,因此,最佳分娩时间框架尚不完全清楚,有些系列表明手术后前2小时内分娩可能对复发率有影响,而其他试验则无差异并在24小时内进行治疗。本评价中分析的随机对照试验中没有患者发生全身毒性反应。另一方面,还记录了其他副作用,包括:化学性膀胱炎和皮肤反应。尽管这是一种安全的方法,但文献中已报道了罕见的严重并发症,这主要是由于接受了长期切除或膀胱穿孔的患者外溢药物所致。为避免潜在的致命并发症,这些患者不应使用SI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号